PySimple1 Material: Difference between revisions

From OpenSeesWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CommandManualMenu}}
This command is used to construct a PySimple1 uniaxial material object:
This command is used to construct a PySimple1 uniaxial material object:


{|  
{|  
Line 27: Line 28:


In general the HHT algorithm is preferred over a Newmark algorithm when using this material. This is due to the numerical oscillations that can develop with viscous damping forces under transient loading with certain solution algorithms and damping ratios.
In general the HHT algorithm is preferred over a Newmark algorithm when using this material. This is due to the numerical oscillations that can develop with viscous damping forces under transient loading with certain solution algorithms and damping ratios.
EQUATIONS and EXAMPLE RESPONSES:
The equations describing PySimple1 behavior are described in Boulanger, R. W., Curras, C. J.,
Kutter, B. L., Wilson, D. W., and Abghari, A. (1999). "Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction
experiments and analyses." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE,
125(9): 750-759. Only minor changes have been made in its implementation for OpenSees.
The nonlinear <math>p-y</math> behavior is conceptualized as consisting of elastic (p-ye), plastic (p-yp), and
gap <math>(p-y^g)</math> components in series. Radiation damping is modeled by a dashpot on the “far-field”
elastic component <math>(p-ye)</math> of the displacement rate. The gap component consists of a nonlinear
closure spring (pc-yg) in parallel with a nonlinear drag spring <math>(p^d-y^g)</math>. Note that <math>y = y^e + y^p + y^g</math>, and that <math>p = p^d + p^c</math>.
The plastic component has an initial range of rigid behavior between <math> -C_r p_\text{ult} < p < C_r p_\text{ult}</math> with
<math>C_r</math> = the ratio of <math>p/p_\text{ult} </math> when plastic yielding first occurs in virgin loading. The rigid range of <math>p</math>,
which is initially <math>2 C_r p_\text{ult}</math>, translates with plastic yielding (kinematic hardening). The rigid range
of <math>p</math> can be constrained to maintain a minimum size on both the positive and negative loading
sides (e.g., 25% of <math>p\text{ult}</math>), and this is accomplished by allowing the rigid range to expand or contract as necessary. Beyond the rigid range, loading of the plastic <math>(p-y^p)</math> component is
described by:
:<math>p = p_{\text{ult}} - (p_{\text{ult}} - p_o) \left [\frac{c y_{50}}{c y_{50} + | z_p - z^p_0|} \right ]^n </math>
where <math>p_\text{ult}</math> = the ultimate resistance of the <math>p-y</math> material in the current loading direction, <math>p_o = p</math> at
the start of the current plastic loading cycle, <math>y^p_o = y_p</math> at the start of the current plastic loading cycle, <math>c</math> = constant to control the tangent modulus at the start of plastic yielding, and n = an exponent to control sharpness of the <math>p-y^p</math> curve.
The closure <math>(p^c-y^g)</math> spring is described by:
:<math>p^c = 1.8 p_{\text{ult}} \left [\frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 50(y_o^\text{+} - y^g)} - \frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 50(y_o^\text{-} - y^g)}  \right ] </math>
where <math>y_o^+</math> = memory term for the positive side of the gap, <math>y_o^-</math>= memory term for the negative side of the gap. The initial values of <math>y_o^+</math> and <math>y_o^-</math>  were set as <math>y_{50}/100</math> and <math>- y_{50}/100</math>, respectively. The factor of 1.8 brings <math>p^c</math> up to <math>p_\text{ult}</math> during virgin loading to <math>y_o^+</math> (or <math>y_o^-</math>). Gap enlargement follows logic similar to that of Matlock et al. (1978). The gap grows on the positive side when the plastic deformation occurs on the negative loading side. Consequently, the <math>y_o^+</math> value equals the opposite value of the largest past negative value of,  <math>y^p + y^g + 1.5 y_{50}</math> where the <math>1.5y_{50}</math> represents
some rebounding of the gap. Similarly, the <math>y_o^-</math> value equals the opposite value of the largest past positive value of <math>y^p+y^g-1.5y_{50}</math>. This closure spring allows for a smooth transition in the load displacement behavior as the gap opens or closes.
The nonlinear drag <math>(p^d-y^g)</math> spring is described by:
:<math>p^d = C_d p_{\text{ult}} - (C_d p_{\text{ult}} - p^d_o) \left [\frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 2| y^g - y^g_o|} \right ]^n </math>
where <math>C_d =</math> ratio of the maximum drag force to the ultimate resistance of the p-y material, <math>d^p_o =p^d</math> at the start of the current loading cycle, and <math>y^g_o = y^g</math> at the start of the current loading cycle.
The flexibility of the above equations can be used to approximate different p-y backbone
relations. Matlock’s (1970) recommended backbone for soft clay is closely approximated using
<math>c = 10</math>, <math>n = 5</math>, and <math>C_r = 0.35</math>. API’s (1993) recommended backbone for drained sand is closely
approximated using <math>c = 0.5</math>, <math>n = 2</math>, and <math>C_r = 0.2</math>. PySimple1 is currently implemented to allow
use of these two default sets of values. Values of <math>p_\text{ult}</math>, <math>y_{50}</math>, and <math>C_d</math> must then be specified to define
the <math>p-y</math> material behavior.
Viscous damping on the far-field (elastic) component of the p-y material is included for
approximating radiation damping. For implementation in OpenSees the viscous damper is placed
across the entire material, but the viscous force is calculated as proportional to the component of
velocity (or displacement) that developed in the far-field elastic component of the material. For
example, this correctly causes the damper force to become zero during load increments across a
fully formed gap. In addition, the total force across the p-y material is restricted to pult in
magnitude so that the viscous damper cannot cause the total force to exceed the near-field soil
capacity. Users should also be familiar with numerical oscillations that can develop in viscous
damper forces under transient loading with certain solution algorithms and damping ratios. In
general, an HHT algorithm is preferred over a Newmark algorithm for reducing such oscillations
in materials like PySimple1.




Line 45: Line 105:
----
----


Code Developed by: <span style="color:blue"> Ross Boulanger, UC Davis </span>
Code Developed by: <span style="color:blue"> Ross Boulanger, UC Davis </span>This command is used to construct a PySimple1 uniaxial material object:

Latest revision as of 22:32, 22 March 2010




This command is used to construct a PySimple1 uniaxial material object:

uniaxialMaterial PySimple1 $matTag $soilType $pult $Y50 $Cd <$c>

$matTag integer tag identifying material
$soilType soilType = 1 Backbone of p-y curve approximates Matlock (1970) soft clay relation.

soilType = 2 Backbone of p-y curve approximates API (1993) sand relation.

$pult Ultimate capacity of the p-y material. Note that "p" or "pult" are distributed loads [force per length of pile] in common design equations, but are both loads for this uniaxialMaterial [i.e., distributed load times the tributary length of the pile].
$Y50 Displacement at which 50% of pult is mobilized in monotonic loading.
$Cd Variable that sets the drag resistance within a fully-mobilized gap as Cd*pult.
$c The viscous damping term (dashpot) on the far-field (elastic) component of the displacement rate (velocity). (optional Default = 0.0). Nonzero c values are used to represent radiation damping effects

NOTES:

In general the HHT algorithm is preferred over a Newmark algorithm when using this material. This is due to the numerical oscillations that can develop with viscous damping forces under transient loading with certain solution algorithms and damping ratios.

EQUATIONS and EXAMPLE RESPONSES:

The equations describing PySimple1 behavior are described in Boulanger, R. W., Curras, C. J., Kutter, B. L., Wilson, D. W., and Abghari, A. (1999). "Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 125(9): 750-759. Only minor changes have been made in its implementation for OpenSees.

The nonlinear <math>p-y</math> behavior is conceptualized as consisting of elastic (p-ye), plastic (p-yp), and gap <math>(p-y^g)</math> components in series. Radiation damping is modeled by a dashpot on the “far-field” elastic component <math>(p-ye)</math> of the displacement rate. The gap component consists of a nonlinear closure spring (pc-yg) in parallel with a nonlinear drag spring <math>(p^d-y^g)</math>. Note that <math>y = y^e + y^p + y^g</math>, and that <math>p = p^d + p^c</math>.

The plastic component has an initial range of rigid behavior between <math> -C_r p_\text{ult} < p < C_r p_\text{ult}</math> with <math>C_r</math> = the ratio of <math>p/p_\text{ult} </math> when plastic yielding first occurs in virgin loading. The rigid range of <math>p</math>, which is initially <math>2 C_r p_\text{ult}</math>, translates with plastic yielding (kinematic hardening). The rigid range of <math>p</math> can be constrained to maintain a minimum size on both the positive and negative loading sides (e.g., 25% of <math>p\text{ult}</math>), and this is accomplished by allowing the rigid range to expand or contract as necessary. Beyond the rigid range, loading of the plastic <math>(p-y^p)</math> component is described by:

<math>p = p_{\text{ult}} - (p_{\text{ult}} - p_o) \left [\frac{c y_{50}}{c y_{50} + | z_p - z^p_0|} \right ]^n </math>

where <math>p_\text{ult}</math> = the ultimate resistance of the <math>p-y</math> material in the current loading direction, <math>p_o = p</math> at the start of the current plastic loading cycle, <math>y^p_o = y_p</math> at the start of the current plastic loading cycle, <math>c</math> = constant to control the tangent modulus at the start of plastic yielding, and n = an exponent to control sharpness of the <math>p-y^p</math> curve.

The closure <math>(p^c-y^g)</math> spring is described by:

<math>p^c = 1.8 p_{\text{ult}} \left [\frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 50(y_o^\text{+} - y^g)} - \frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 50(y_o^\text{-} - y^g)} \right ] </math>

where <math>y_o^+</math> = memory term for the positive side of the gap, <math>y_o^-</math>= memory term for the negative side of the gap. The initial values of <math>y_o^+</math> and <math>y_o^-</math> were set as <math>y_{50}/100</math> and <math>- y_{50}/100</math>, respectively. The factor of 1.8 brings <math>p^c</math> up to <math>p_\text{ult}</math> during virgin loading to <math>y_o^+</math> (or <math>y_o^-</math>). Gap enlargement follows logic similar to that of Matlock et al. (1978). The gap grows on the positive side when the plastic deformation occurs on the negative loading side. Consequently, the <math>y_o^+</math> value equals the opposite value of the largest past negative value of, <math>y^p + y^g + 1.5 y_{50}</math> where the <math>1.5y_{50}</math> represents some rebounding of the gap. Similarly, the <math>y_o^-</math> value equals the opposite value of the largest past positive value of <math>y^p+y^g-1.5y_{50}</math>. This closure spring allows for a smooth transition in the load displacement behavior as the gap opens or closes.


The nonlinear drag <math>(p^d-y^g)</math> spring is described by:

<math>p^d = C_d p_{\text{ult}} - (C_d p_{\text{ult}} - p^d_o) \left [\frac{y_{50}}{y_{50} + 2| y^g - y^g_o|} \right ]^n </math>


where <math>C_d =</math> ratio of the maximum drag force to the ultimate resistance of the p-y material, <math>d^p_o =p^d</math> at the start of the current loading cycle, and <math>y^g_o = y^g</math> at the start of the current loading cycle.

The flexibility of the above equations can be used to approximate different p-y backbone relations. Matlock’s (1970) recommended backbone for soft clay is closely approximated using <math>c = 10</math>, <math>n = 5</math>, and <math>C_r = 0.35</math>. API’s (1993) recommended backbone for drained sand is closely approximated using <math>c = 0.5</math>, <math>n = 2</math>, and <math>C_r = 0.2</math>. PySimple1 is currently implemented to allow use of these two default sets of values. Values of <math>p_\text{ult}</math>, <math>y_{50}</math>, and <math>C_d</math> must then be specified to define the <math>p-y</math> material behavior.

Viscous damping on the far-field (elastic) component of the p-y material is included for approximating radiation damping. For implementation in OpenSees the viscous damper is placed across the entire material, but the viscous force is calculated as proportional to the component of velocity (or displacement) that developed in the far-field elastic component of the material. For example, this correctly causes the damper force to become zero during load increments across a fully formed gap. In addition, the total force across the p-y material is restricted to pult in magnitude so that the viscous damper cannot cause the total force to exceed the near-field soil capacity. Users should also be familiar with numerical oscillations that can develop in viscous damper forces under transient loading with certain solution algorithms and damping ratios. In general, an HHT algorithm is preferred over a Newmark algorithm for reducing such oscillations in materials like PySimple1.



EXAMPLE:



REFERENCES:

"Seismic Soil-pile-strcture interaction experiments and analysis", Boulanger, R.w., Curras, C.J., Kutter, B.L., Wilson, D.W., and Abghari, A. (1990). Jornal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCS, 125(9):750-759.


Code Developed by: Ross Boulanger, UC Davis This command is used to construct a PySimple1 uniaxial material object: