Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
According to bellow picture, I want to model an Ibarra-Krawinkler hysteretic material for an infill compressive strut:
http://uupload.ir/files/jqr8_strut_matrial.jpg
When I used "uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic" material, this error apeared:
"HystereticMaterial::HystereticMaterial -- input backbone is not unique (one-to-one)"
On the other hand, "uniaxialMaterial ModIMKPinching" doesn't consider the pinching factor for strain (kd) and "uniaxialMaterial Pinching4" material is very complicated.
Now, what is the solution?
How can model an asymmetric hysteresis material with pinching parameters (kd and kf) in Opensees?
http://uupload.ir/files/jqr8_strut_matrial.jpg
When I used "uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic" material, this error apeared:
"HystereticMaterial::HystereticMaterial -- input backbone is not unique (one-to-one)"
On the other hand, "uniaxialMaterial ModIMKPinching" doesn't consider the pinching factor for strain (kd) and "uniaxialMaterial Pinching4" material is very complicated.
Now, what is the solution?
How can model an asymmetric hysteresis material with pinching parameters (kd and kf) in Opensees?
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
I've gotten this error already,because the value of second strain should be bigger than first strain,third strain should be bigger than second strain.
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
ashf wrote:
> I've gotten this error already,because the value of second strain should be
> bigger than first strain,third strain should be bigger than second strain.
Thank you for the solution . The problem was solved
> I've gotten this error already,because the value of second strain should be
> bigger than first strain,third strain should be bigger than second strain.
Thank you for the solution . The problem was solved
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:09 pm
- Location: guangzhou university
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
Hi Friends,
I am using this Hysteretic Uniaxial Material, but I always get the reply: HystereticMaterial::HystereticMaterial -- input backbone is not unique (one-to-one)
Here is my codes. I don't really know why it is wrong. The second strain is smaller than the first one? I don't think so......
uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.004 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
THANKS a lot!
I am using this Hysteretic Uniaxial Material, but I always get the reply: HystereticMaterial::HystereticMaterial -- input backbone is not unique (one-to-one)
Here is my codes. I don't really know why it is wrong. The second strain is smaller than the first one? I don't think so......
uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.004 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
THANKS a lot!
-
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:50 pm
- Location: University of California, Berkeley
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
Please try
uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.00405 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.00405 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:09 pm
- Location: guangzhou university
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
selimgunay wrote:
> Please try
>
> uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.00405 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
Thank you so much!
Can I ask why "-0.004" is changed to "-0.00405"?
Because I have many similar lines of code should be changed like this.
THANK YOU!
> Please try
>
> uniaxialMaterial Hysteretic 1105 129171 0.004 173792 0.01 -129171 -0.004 -129171 -0.00405 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.0
Thank you so much!
Can I ask why "-0.004" is changed to "-0.00405"?
Because I have many similar lines of code should be changed like this.
THANK YOU!
-
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:50 pm
- Location: University of California, Berkeley
Re: Modeling of asymmetric hysteresis material
Because the strains in consecutive points should go in an increasing order.