OpenSeesSP and OpenSeesMP questions.
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:27 pm
Hi,
I'm studying OpenSees parallel computing with the document 'TN-2007-16' ( http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/p ... essing.pdf ).
and I would like to ask a question about OpenSeesSP and OpenSeesMP.
For OpenSeesSP examples(Section 4.2 of TN-2007-16), 'model.tcl' is divided into many pieces(using substucture analysis or other methods) depending on the number of CPU cores and then subjected to static or dynamic loads.
(In other words, CPU01 is analyzing top-half of 'model.tcl' subjected to given loads, CPU02 is analyzing bottom-half of 'model.tcl' subjected to given loads, and so on. and then the result of CPU01, CPU02 is combined at the end of analysis.)
And for OpenSeesMP examples(Section 5.3.i and 5.3.ii of TN-2007-16), same 'model.tcl' is subjected to 'n' numbers of ground motions and analyzed in each separate CPU cores.
(In other words, CPU01 is analyzing 'model.tcl' subjected to GM1, CPU02 is analyzing 'model.tcl' subjected to GM2... and so on.)
Am I understanding it right?
I'm studying OpenSees parallel computing with the document 'TN-2007-16' ( http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/p ... essing.pdf ).
and I would like to ask a question about OpenSeesSP and OpenSeesMP.
For OpenSeesSP examples(Section 4.2 of TN-2007-16), 'model.tcl' is divided into many pieces(using substucture analysis or other methods) depending on the number of CPU cores and then subjected to static or dynamic loads.
(In other words, CPU01 is analyzing top-half of 'model.tcl' subjected to given loads, CPU02 is analyzing bottom-half of 'model.tcl' subjected to given loads, and so on. and then the result of CPU01, CPU02 is combined at the end of analysis.)
And for OpenSeesMP examples(Section 5.3.i and 5.3.ii of TN-2007-16), same 'model.tcl' is subjected to 'n' numbers of ground motions and analyzed in each separate CPU cores.
(In other words, CPU01 is analyzing 'model.tcl' subjected to GM1, CPU02 is analyzing 'model.tcl' subjected to GM2... and so on.)
Am I understanding it right?