modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
yas
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:51 pm

modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Post by yas »

hello everybody

I, ve modeled eccentrically braced frame but I don,t know how to consider buckling.should I use two element for every braces and how can i do that?I, ve read something about "imperfection" .would you please guid me.
thanks in advance
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Post by fmk »

have a look at the following for a discusion of the issues:

http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... n_elements
yas
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:51 pm

Re: modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Post by yas »

hello dear all
I,ve modeled two elements for each brace for considering buckling.now I,m going to remove some elements like a column and the related brace ,before analyzing.but I don,t know should I remove both of the brace elements or only the single element of the brace that is connected to the column to work truly in analyzing?
thanks in advance
mhscott
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Corvallis, Oregon USA
Contact:

Re: modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Post by mhscott »

First, you should try what you are asking to see what happens. I suspect you will probably need to remove both. Removing just one could lead to rigid body motion and analysis failure.
yas
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:51 pm

Re: modeling braces by consideration of buckling

Post by yas »

hello everybody
I'm considering imperfection in my braces,but I don't know about the direction of these added nodes ?for example If I want to consider l/1000 for an initial imperfection,I should use positive buckling or a negative one ?
thanks in advance
Post Reply