Rayleigh damping
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:05 am
- Location: Democritus University of Thrace
Rayleigh damping
How can I find the rayleigh damping?
Re: Rayleigh damping
What was the question exactly?
Re: Rayleigh damping
vesna wrote:
> What was the question exactly?
hi,
I have a question. Should we include the geometric stiffness matrix in stiffness matrix for calculating Rayleigh damping or not?
Yours faithfully,
Cuong
> What was the question exactly?
hi,
I have a question. Should we include the geometric stiffness matrix in stiffness matrix for calculating Rayleigh damping or not?
Yours faithfully,
Cuong
Re: Rayleigh damping
vesna wrote:
> What was the question exactly?
The damping matrix D is specified as a combination of stiffness and mass-proportional damping matrices:
D = $alphaM * M + $betaK * Kcurrent +$betaKinit * Kinit + $betaKcomm * KlastCommit (1)
How to obtain alphaM, betaK ...?
We calculate alphaM and betaK (Rayleigh damping: C = anphaM*M +betaK*K) from 2 natural frequencies. (2)
Reference: Finley A. Charney, "Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures", J. Struct. Engrg. Volume 134, Issue 4, pp. 581-592 (April 2008)
There is 3 cases for application of eq. (1):
1. D = $alphaM * M + $betaK * Kcurrent
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaK = betaK
2. D = $alphaM * M + $betaKinit * Kinit
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaKinit = betaK
3. D = $alphaM * M + $betaKcomm * KlastCommit
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaKcomm = betaK
Is it right?
Thank you in advanced for your answer
> What was the question exactly?
The damping matrix D is specified as a combination of stiffness and mass-proportional damping matrices:
D = $alphaM * M + $betaK * Kcurrent +$betaKinit * Kinit + $betaKcomm * KlastCommit (1)
How to obtain alphaM, betaK ...?
We calculate alphaM and betaK (Rayleigh damping: C = anphaM*M +betaK*K) from 2 natural frequencies. (2)
Reference: Finley A. Charney, "Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures", J. Struct. Engrg. Volume 134, Issue 4, pp. 581-592 (April 2008)
There is 3 cases for application of eq. (1):
1. D = $alphaM * M + $betaK * Kcurrent
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaK = betaK
2. D = $alphaM * M + $betaKinit * Kinit
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaKinit = betaK
3. D = $alphaM * M + $betaKcomm * KlastCommit
where $alphaM = alphaM, $betaKcomm = betaK
Is it right?
Thank you in advanced for your answer
Re: Rayleigh damping
Yes, you are right about everything.