I used the concreteZ01, and its performance is good.

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
borjiajia
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:08 am
Location: DL, China

I used the concreteZ01, and its performance is good.

Post by borjiajia »

Thank you for your previous answers. And now I have new problems.
I used the ConcreteZ01 and SteelZ01 which are written by UT, and the results turn out to be satisfying.
But there still two problems confused with me.

1, after running the programs, part of it shows as follows, I never run into this, what may the reason be?
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
approachFiveToComStrain = 0
reloadPath = 1
zeta = 1
reverseFromOneStrain = -0.000266248
reverseFromOneStress = 0
fiveToOneStrain = -1.#IND
ConcreteZ01::getApproachFiveToComStrain -- No intersection of reloading path wi
h descending branch!
ConcreteZ01::getApproachFiveToComStrain -- overflow the iteration limit!
ConcreteZ01::getApproachFiveToComStrain -- can not get approachFiveToComStrain!

approachFiveToComStrain = 0
reloadPath = 1
zeta = 1
reverseFromOneStrain = -0.000372723
reverseFromOneStress = 0
fiveToOneStrain = -1.#IND
#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2, In case a node named node A already has vertical displacement,then I want to run displacement control and the control node is node A.
Is it workable?
休息4 pm to 0 pm . 问问题at 1 am~2 pm.
vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Re: I used the concreteZ01, and its performance is good.

Post by vesna »

1. I never used ConcreteZ01 so i do not know what is the meaning of the messages that ConcreteZ01 prints out.

2. I think it is.
Post Reply