HUGE difference in natural period using C01 and C02

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Jfoyian
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:42 pm

HUGE difference in natural period using C01 and C02

Post by Jfoyian »

Hi,

I am conducting dynamic analysis for an 8 story cantilever RC shear wall. The problem is that, I am getting the natural period T=0.49 when I use concrete C02, but T=1.94 when I use concrete C01. I couldn't figure out why that difference is that big and I was wondering which one I should go with.

Thanks for your help.
silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia »

good results.
they models are different and, likely, the tensile stiffness controls in some section locations, and they definitely do have different tensile stiffnesses.

i'd go with concrete02, there is no practical advantage to concrete01, the reduced number of parameter differences are minimal.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Post Reply