using model builder for a 2D problem,
model BasicBuilder -ndm 2 -ndf 3
which mean that we have trasfomation in X and Y direction and rotation in Z axis.
how the program knows that the third one is rotation in Z axis(direction 6)?
especially when we need to model rotational spring in direction 6?
question on Model builder
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
direction 6 in 3D is direction 3 in 2D.
the stiffness matrix pretty much specifies what the directions are. this matrix comes from the elements. likely, you are using beam-column elements and in 2D they have 3Dof's at the nodes: 2 translations and one rotation.
the stiffness matrix pretty much specifies what the directions are. this matrix comes from the elements. likely, you are using beam-column elements and in 2D they have 3Dof's at the nodes: 2 translations and one rotation.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Dear Silvia,
is this comment correct:
for modelling rotational spring, we need to tell the program direction 3 instead of 6, like:
element zeroLength 2 1 3 -mat 4 -dir 3
Another question is in the example of limit state material, Ken used 2D model and with " -ndm 2 -ndf 3" and for introducing zero length end springs for example he used the following:
element zeroLength 3 3 4 -mat $shearTag $axialFailTag centerSlipTag -dir 1 2 6
which means in 2D model he used direction 6 which is not correct.
Thanks
Shahram
is this comment correct:
for modelling rotational spring, we need to tell the program direction 3 instead of 6, like:
element zeroLength 2 1 3 -mat 4 -dir 3
Another question is in the example of limit state material, Ken used 2D model and with " -ndm 2 -ndf 3" and for introducing zero length end springs for example he used the following:
element zeroLength 3 3 4 -mat $shearTag $axialFailTag centerSlipTag -dir 1 2 6
which means in 2D model he used direction 6 which is not correct.
Thanks
Shahram