Many elements in OpenSees which are based on link elements(2 Node, 12 DOF) have geometric stiffness inbuilt in them. Does anybody know the theoretical formulation of these geometric stiffness matrix? I know the formulation of simple truss(2-D) and beam elements but can't figure how to formulate geometric stiffness of link element.
Geometric stiffness from elastomeric bearing in local co-ordinates is as below:
// add geometric stiffness to local stiffness
double kGeo1 = 0.5*qb(0);
kl(5,1) -= kGeo1;
kl(5,7) += kGeo1;
kl(11,1) -= kGeo1;
kl(11,7) += kGeo1;
kl(4,2) += kGeo1;
kl(4,8) -= kGeo1;
kl(10,2) += kGeo1;
kl(10,8) -= kGeo1;
double kGeo2 = kGeo1*shearDistI*L;
kl(5,5) += kGeo2;
kl(11,5) -= kGeo2;
kl(4,4) += kGeo2;
kl(10,4) -= kGeo2;
double kGeo3 = kGeo1*(1.0 - shearDistI)*L;
kl(5,11) -= kGeo3;
kl(11,11) += kGeo3;
kl(4,10) -= kGeo3;
kl(10,10) += kGeo3;
Geometric stiffness in link element
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
Geometric stiffness in link element
Manish Kumar
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
http://www.manishkumar.org
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
http://www.manishkumar.org
Re: Geometric stiffness in link element
All formulas are given in the source code:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/WebSVN/lis ... ddc5e1def1
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/WebSVN/lis ... ddc5e1def1
Re: Geometric stiffness in link element
Thanks Vesna,
I understand the formulation for two node link element. But the above geometric stiffness matrix I presented is for Elastomeric bearing element, and it's different from usual two node link elements. If you look carefully in the source code of elastomeric bearing, the geometric stiffness terms are in rotational direction, which seem unusual to me.
If you compare the geometric stiffness in the source codes of the two-node link element for the case D3N12 (3D, 12 DOF) to the elastomeric bearing element, they are different, although I think they are supposed to be the same?
I searched a lot, but couldn't come to the same answer as in elastomeric bearing. So I was wondering if it is correct in elastomeric bearing, and if it is, is there a place or related reference where I can find the theoretical derivation of that?
I understand the formulation for two node link element. But the above geometric stiffness matrix I presented is for Elastomeric bearing element, and it's different from usual two node link elements. If you look carefully in the source code of elastomeric bearing, the geometric stiffness terms are in rotational direction, which seem unusual to me.
If you compare the geometric stiffness in the source codes of the two-node link element for the case D3N12 (3D, 12 DOF) to the elastomeric bearing element, they are different, although I think they are supposed to be the same?
I searched a lot, but couldn't come to the same answer as in elastomeric bearing. So I was wondering if it is correct in elastomeric bearing, and if it is, is there a place or related reference where I can find the theoretical derivation of that?
Manish Kumar
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
http://www.manishkumar.org
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
http://www.manishkumar.org
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:42 am
- Location: Tehran Polytechnic (AmirKabir University Of Technology ), Tehran, Iran
Re: Geometric stiffness in link element
Dear maksins
did you work with ElastomericBearing element in 2D ?
or any other Base Isolation material such as KIKUCHI ?
did you compared the results such as Hysteresis Curves of OpenSees and Other Programs such as SAP2000 ?
did you work with ElastomericBearing element in 2D ?
or any other Base Isolation material such as KIKUCHI ?
did you compared the results such as Hysteresis Curves of OpenSees and Other Programs such as SAP2000 ?
Aryan Rezaie Rad
Teaching Assistant & M.Sc Civil Earthquake Engineering Graduate Student
Amirkabir University of technology (Tehran Polytechnic)
Teaching Assistant & M.Sc Civil Earthquake Engineering Graduate Student
Amirkabir University of technology (Tehran Polytechnic)
new parameters in elastomericBearing
Dear Vesna
We have two new parameters in "element elastomericBearing ... "
$alpha 2 and $mu.
(elastomericBearing $eleTag $i $j $kInit $fy $alpha1 [[[ $alpha2 ]]] [[[ $mu ]]] -P $matTag -Mz $matTag <-orient $x1 $x2 $x3 $y1 $y2 $y3> <-shearDist $sDratio> <-doRayleigh> <-mass $m>)
please explain these two parameters.
I can guess both of them. but I'm not sure .
We have two new parameters in "element elastomericBearing ... "
$alpha 2 and $mu.
(elastomericBearing $eleTag $i $j $kInit $fy $alpha1 [[[ $alpha2 ]]] [[[ $mu ]]] -P $matTag -Mz $matTag <-orient $x1 $x2 $x3 $y1 $y2 $y3> <-shearDist $sDratio> <-doRayleigh> <-mass $m>)
please explain these two parameters.
I can guess both of them. but I'm not sure .