Discretize or Use integration points

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
aliirmak
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Location: PU,West Lafayette, IN

Discretize or Use integration points

Post by aliirmak »

Which one is a better approach to solve a pushover analysis?

Discretize the elements into smaller elements using nodes or use about 5 integration points for the elements?

Thanks for the help
silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia »

use 5 integration points with the force-based element, which is the optimal number.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
aliirmak
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Location: PU,West Lafayette, IN

Post by aliirmak »

Thanks a lot for the answer.

The two modeling styles i proposed above may give different results which is varying up to %15 so far. Definitely, elements having 5 integration points are more accurate.

So far, displacement based element with 5 ip was the best when i compared analytical results with experimental data. After i review material properties in my model, I will be able to tell distinctly which one (force based or displacement based) works for me best.
Post Reply