localForce problem

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Lost
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:08 am
Location: National Technical University of Athens

localForce problem

Post by Lost »

Hello! I am using localForce recorders to record element forces. However, the numbers I get aren't correct.
I am giving an example, where I have divided a beam in three parts modelled with elasticBeamColumn. Its load is 11.96 per length unit, parts 1 and 3 have length 0.92 and the 2nd one 2.76. The results are as follows for a given time 1658.47 at a pushover analysis: (The torque is a bit different as I have used rigid elements in between)

1st: 1658.47 0 0 [17.1728] -1.2567 57.6861 0 0 0 -6.16607 1.2567 {-46.9502} 0
2nd: 1658.47 0 0 [50.1931] -0.498775 {46.9502} 0 0 0 [-17.1728] 0.498775 {46.0147} 0
3nd: 1658.47 0 0 61.1998 2.58462 {-46.0147} 0 0 0 [-50.1931] -2.58462 97.2554 0

As you see, the moments seem to be correct, however the shear forces are in the wrong place, confusing the beginning node and the end node. Simple static analysis knowing the load, length and moments at the ends show that shear forces are the opposite way too. Is there maybe an error in the transformation vectors I have used or a bug in the recorder? Thanks! :D
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: localForce problem

Post by fmk »

not quite sure what your analysis is, here is a simple model with theose values showing results are correct for local force directions we use in OpenSees:

model basic -ndm 2 -ndf 3

# nodes
set nodeTag 0;
set xCoords {0.0 0.92 3.68 4.60}
foreach xCoord $xCoords {
incr nodeTag
node $nodeTag $xCoord 0.
set L $xCoord
}

# fix supports
fix 1 1 1 0
fix $nodeTag 1 1 0

# elements
geomTransf Linear 1
set A 10.0; set E 10000.0; set I 1000.0;
element elasticBeamColumn 1 1 2 $A $E $I 1
element elasticBeamColumn 2 2 3 $A $E $I 1
element elasticBeamColumn 3 3 4 $A $E $I 1

# load
set w -11.96
timeSeries Linear 1
pattern Plain 1 1 {
eleLoad -ele 1 2 3 -type -beamUniform $w 0.
}

#analysis
integrator LoadControl 1.0
test NormDispIncr 1.0e-12 2
algorithm Newton
system ProfileSPD
numberer Plain
constraints Plain
analysis Static
analyze 1


#check results
puts " EXACT COMPUTED"
set formatString { %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s}
puts [format $formatString V1 V2 M1 M2 V1 V2 M1 M2]
set formatString {%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f%15.5f}

set R1 [expr $w*$L/2.0]
for {set i 1} {$i < $nodeTag} {incr i 1} {
set eleForces [eleResponse $i localForces]
set loc1 [lindex $xCoords [expr $i-1]]
set loc2 [lindex $xCoords $i]
set V1 [expr -($R1-$w*$loc1)];
set V2 [expr $R1-$w*$loc2];
set M1 [expr $R1*$loc1-($w*$loc1*$loc1/2.0)];
set M2 [expr -($R1*$loc2-($w*$loc2*$loc2/2.0))];
puts [format $formatString $V1 $M1 $V2 $M2 [lindex $eleForces 1] [lindex $eleForces 2] [lindex $eleForces 4] [lindex $eleForces 5]]
}
Lost
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:08 am
Location: National Technical University of Athens

Re: localForce problem

Post by Lost »

Thanks for the reply!
I made the model in 3d and the results seem to be in different order:

EDIT: The problem seems to exist only with shear forces in Z axis, loading the beam in Y axis gives correct shear forces.

wipe

model basic -ndm 3 -ndf 6

# nodes
set nodeTag 0;
set xCoords {0.0 0.92 3.68 4.60}
foreach xCoord $xCoords {
incr nodeTag
node $nodeTag $xCoord 0. 0.
set L $xCoord
}

# fix supports
fix 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
fix $nodeTag 1 1 1 0 0 0

# elements
geomTransf Linear 1 0 0 1
set A 10.0; set E 10000.0; set I 1000.0; set J 1000.0; set G 10000.0
element elasticBeamColumn 1 1 2 $A $E $G $J $I $I 1
element elasticBeamColumn 2 2 3 $A $E $G $J $I $I 1
element elasticBeamColumn 3 3 4 $A $E $G $J $I $I 1

# load
set w -11.96
timeSeries Linear 1
pattern Plain 1 1 {
eleLoad -ele 1 2 3 -type -beamUniform 0. $w 0.
}

#analysis
integrator LoadControl 1.0
test NormDispIncr 1.0e-12 2
algorithm Newton
system ProfileSPD
numberer Plain
constraints Plain
analysis Static
analyze 1


#check results
# puts " EXACT COMPUTED"
# set formatString { %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s}
# puts [format $formatString V1 V2 M1 M2 V1 V2 M1 M2]
set formatString {%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f%8.2f}

# set R1 [expr $w*$L/2.0]
for {set i 1} {$i < $nodeTag} {incr i 1} {
set eleForces [eleResponse $i localForces]
# set loc1 [lindex $xCoords [expr $i-1]]
# set loc2 [lindex $xCoords $i]
# set V1 [expr -($R1-$w*$loc1)];
# set V2 [expr $R1-$w*$loc2];
# set M1 [expr $R1*$loc1-($w*$loc1*$loc1/2.0)];
# set M2 [expr -($R1*$loc2-($w*$loc2*$loc2/2.0))];
# puts [format $formatString $V1 $M1 $V2 $M2 [lindex $eleForces 1] [lindex $eleForces 2] [lindex $eleForces 4] [lindex $eleForces 5]]
puts [format $formatString [lindex $eleForces 0] [lindex $eleForces 1] [lindex $eleForces 2] [lindex $eleForces 3] [lindex $eleForces 4] [lindex $eleForces 5] [lindex $eleForces 6] [lindex $eleForces 7] [lindex $eleForces 8] [lindex $eleForces 9] [lindex $eleForces 10] [lindex $eleForces 11]]
}
Lost
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:08 am
Location: National Technical University of Athens

Re: localForce problem

Post by Lost »

Hi! Since the new version has been released (thanks for the 64-bit version! :-) ), I tried testing the codes above again and the problem seems to persist. So I am bringing this topic up for the next update! Thanks for the hard work!
mhscott
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Corvallis, Oregon USA
Contact:

Re: localForce problem

Post by mhscott »

Frank and I should have it sorted out tomorrow.
Post Reply