Calibration of Maxwell Material's Issue

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
rmandok
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:05 am

Calibration of Maxwell Material's Issue

Post by rmandok »

Recently I asked how to model Viscous Damping and I had been directed to this example:
[url]http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... _Material/[/url]
I read the explanation of this example and in this example it is discussed that element "forceBeamColumn" should be used for viscous element.
But when I downloaded the example, "nonlinearBeamColumn" element is used in tcl files.
Now I am wondering which element is more appropriate to define Viscous damping, "forceBeamColumn" or "nonlinearBeamColumn"?
linguan118
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:36 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Calibration of Maxwell Material's Issue

Post by linguan118 »

They're the same to me.
Research Assistant Professor, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
guanlin@polyu.edu.hk
vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Re: Calibration of Maxwell Material's Issue

Post by vesna »

If you look at the manual you will see that to define force-based element you can use "forceBeamColumn" or "nonlinearBeamColumn".
Post Reply