In my model, masses are concentrated at the nodes where columns and beams meet according to the tributary mass per node. I use rigid diaphragm constraint to each floor and each floor has three freedoms: UX, UY and RZ.
So I define mass as follow:
mass $node $m $m 0 0 0 0
my questions are
1- is opensees can calculate the rotational inertia of mass automatic.
2- if not so how can i define the rotational inertia of mass
3-if i use a uniform mass (distributed) like example 5.1 . the rotational mass inertia will be m(bx*bx+by*by)/12 . it is mean i will use all ,masses as a lumbed mass at master point. ( is it mean that the displacement at master point ux,uy,Rz will be the same if the masses are concentrated at corner nodes)
mass rotational moment of inertia
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
1-2
OpenSees does not calculate rotational inertia automatically from the translational values, you specify it as the rotational degree-of-freedom mass.
3- OpenSees uses a lumped-mass matrix, so it would concentrate the mass at the end nodes. In this situation, I believe, OpenSees does calculate the inertial mass for all necessary dofs.
OpenSees does not calculate rotational inertia automatically from the translational values, you specify it as the rotational degree-of-freedom mass.
3- OpenSees uses a lumped-mass matrix, so it would concentrate the mass at the end nodes. In this situation, I believe, OpenSees does calculate the inertial mass for all necessary dofs.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
mass matrix, it can use both
It can use both lumped (good for very large models) and consistent mass matrix (good in any case...). It depends what you supply.
Boris
Boris
Re: rotational mass
dr Silvia Mazzoni
in example of 7 for Wsection, you have not assigned any rotational mass component, you have used for example mass 1 $Mtop 0 $Mtop 0 0 0??
silvia wrote:
> 1-2
> OpenSees does not calculate rotational inertia automatically from the
> translational values, you specify it as the rotational degree-of-freedom
> mass.
>
> 3- OpenSees uses a lumped-mass matrix, so it would concentrate the mass at
> the end nodes. In this situation, I believe, OpenSees does calculate the
> inertial mass for all necessary dofs.
in example of 7 for Wsection, you have not assigned any rotational mass component, you have used for example mass 1 $Mtop 0 $Mtop 0 0 0??
silvia wrote:
> 1-2
> OpenSees does not calculate rotational inertia automatically from the
> translational values, you specify it as the rotational degree-of-freedom
> mass.
>
> 3- OpenSees uses a lumped-mass matrix, so it would concentrate the mass at
> the end nodes. In this situation, I believe, OpenSees does calculate the
> inertial mass for all necessary dofs.