Spring and Damper
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:53 pm
- Location: Tokyo Institute of Technology,
- Contact:
Spring and Damper
Dear Dr. Silvia,
Are there elements representing spring and damper properties. Is it possible to model a link element with gap property
combined with spring and damper (Kelvin-Voigt element) in OpenSees.
Are there elements representing spring and damper properties. Is it possible to model a link element with gap property
combined with spring and damper (Kelvin-Voigt element) in OpenSees.
manoj
you can try some of those elements that we do have (i'd use a zero-length element for a spring).
see the user manual:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/m ... index.html
see the user manual:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/m ... index.html
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
element zeroLength 35 54 11 -mat 2 -dir 3
This command is only for link relation of traslation along globle z axe. So I want to know the link relation of translation along globle X, Z axes or rotaion about globle X, Y, Z axes. fix or free?
Section Aggregator 1 2 Vy 5 Mz
The same question for section Aggregator. such as P, Vz is how to define.
This command is only for link relation of traslation along globle z axe. So I want to know the link relation of translation along globle X, Z axes or rotaion about globle X, Y, Z axes. fix or free?
Section Aggregator 1 2 Vy 5 Mz
The same question for section Aggregator. such as P, Vz is how to define.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
When I use the truss element to simulate the longitudinal friction hystereticrelation and the transversal friction hysteretic relation. THe OpenSees give warning for the following commands. Is there something wrong?
equalDOF 183 41 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 3 1188.62 594310 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Uniaxial 3 3 Vz
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy 3 Vz
element truss 1 183 41 10
When I use the following commands, no warning appears, but transversal direction is fixed, not for hysteretic relation.
equalDOF 183 41 2 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 3 1188.62 594310 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Uniaxial 3 3 Vz
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy 3 Vz
element truss 1 183 41 10
equalDOF 183 41 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 3 1188.62 594310 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Uniaxial 3 3 Vz
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy 3 Vz
element truss 1 183 41 10
When I use the following commands, no warning appears, but transversal direction is fixed, not for hysteretic relation.
equalDOF 183 41 2 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 3 1188.62 594310 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Uniaxial 3 3 Vz
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy 3 Vz
element truss 1 183 41 10
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
UmfpackGenLinDOE:setSize - n 1760 nnz 30470 IVal 609400
UMD2FA: matrix is singular. Only 1759 pivots found
WARNING UmfpackGeLinSolveCurrentStep<> -theLinearSysofEqn failed in solve<>
StaticAnalysis:: analyze<> - the Algorithm failed at iteration: 0 with at load factor 0.05
analyze failed, returned:-3 error flag
When the last line appears it means the result is unbelievable, right?
UMD2FA: matrix is singular. Only 1759 pivots found
WARNING UmfpackGeLinSolveCurrentStep<> -theLinearSysofEqn failed in solve<>
StaticAnalysis:: analyze<> - the Algorithm failed at iteration: 0 with at load factor 0.05
analyze failed, returned:-3 error flag
When the last line appears it means the result is unbelievable, right?
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:35 pm
- Location: China
I want to simulate the longitudinal and transversal friction hysteresis energy of bridge bearings. So I don't assign any flexural stiffness.
equalDOF 183 41 2 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy
element truss 1 183 41 10
If I only simulate the longitudinal that's ok.
If I use the Zero-length Element that's ok.
equalDOF 183 41 2 3 4 6
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 1.0e10
uniaxialMaterial Steel01 2 331.2 165600 0.1
section Uniaxial 2 2 Vy
section Aggregator 10 1 P 2 Vy
element truss 1 183 41 10
If I only simulate the longitudinal that's ok.
If I use the Zero-length Element that's ok.