Hi
Why do you wanna do such a thing? What is wrong with steel02 material?
you may get the result in case of monotonic loading but you will have much trouble in cyclic loading. the best way to make sure that your braces work properly is using steel02 material.
Hi, pejman! I read your script about the Buckling in Useful Scripts. But I want to know that whether your script accounted for the local buckling? Thanks!
Ben-Peng, Postgraduate student
South China University of Technology
Guangzhou, China
The script I wrote is somehow a reformed version of Dr.Patxi uriz codes. Actually I was working on the subject while he had already finished his work and I did not know that. By the way, to answer your question I can say that most uniaxial elements normally are not able to account for local buckling since they are uniaxial! unless a suitable damage model is embedded so that local buckling due to low cyclic fatigue or local buckling due to low D/t ratio can be modeled. force beam column element does not support such a characteristic but as far as I know fatige material written by Dr.Uriz has capability to consider low cyclic fatigue and degraded behavior. But currently I am working on this topic as my primary research to add a uniaxial element in Opensees which can model local buckling due to low D/t ratio.