EQ direction

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
jefferyr
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Portland State University

EQ direction

Post by jefferyr »

Hello,

currently I have two earthquakes records being applied to directions 1 and 3. If I wanted to rotate these, what's the easiest way? Do I need to rotate the nodes relative to the global axes, or is there a more direct method to do it?

Thanks,

jeff
vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Post by vesna »

Jeff,

For what angle do you want to rotate it?
jefferyr
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Portland State University

Eq orientation

Post by jefferyr »

Lets say the two earthquakes are still orthogonal to each other, but I want to rotate them relative to the longitudinal axis of the bridge. So, maybe a rotation of 30 degrees or 45 degrees, or better yet, a variable amount of theta degrees.
vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Post by vesna »

There is no way of assigning the earthquake that acts on the model with an angle between 0 and 90 degrees relative to the global axis.

However, there are two ways to assign the earthquake acting with an angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the bridge:
1. You can perform transformation of ground motion records from rotated axes to global axes and assign transformed ground motions to the global direction of the bridge.
2. You can set up the global axes to coincide with the directions of ground motions and define the model with respect to this coordinate system.
jefferyr
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Portland State University

EQ directions

Post by jefferyr »

That's what I thought. I'll probably make a new tcl script that will take the old 2 accel records and make new earthquake acceleration records treating the old accel values as vectors and breaking them into new components to reflect the new directions. Is this the same as your option #1?

Thanks
vesna
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:23 am
Location: UC Berkeley

Post by vesna »

Yes, that is the option #1.
canim_ken
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:50 am
Location: Sharif University of Technology

Re: EQ direction

Post by canim_ken »

Hi,
The other option is rotating the translational masses which is assigned in nodes to any angle you want.
Hadi Kenarangi
Post Reply