Convergence Problem!
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
Convergence Problem!
Hi
I'm a new user in Opensees. I'm working on MPA.The structural model is made by nonlinear beam column elements. when the model is analysed by nonlinear history analysis, I face a problem:the model shows nonlinear behavior, a warning message is appeared and the analysis would be stopped.the problem is a convergence problem and even after 1000 iteration it can not solve it. when I make the time steps smaller or change the algorithm the problem wouldn't be solved.please help me to overcome this problem.
I'm a new user in Opensees. I'm working on MPA.The structural model is made by nonlinear beam column elements. when the model is analysed by nonlinear history analysis, I face a problem:the model shows nonlinear behavior, a warning message is appeared and the analysis would be stopped.the problem is a convergence problem and even after 1000 iteration it can not solve it. when I make the time steps smaller or change the algorithm the problem wouldn't be solved.please help me to overcome this problem.
Last edited by azari on Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hello,azari ,i am studying the MPA,can i make a contact with you .
maybe we can make communion on the MPA.here is my email,wenqiguang81412@126.com
maybe we can make communion on the MPA.here is my email,wenqiguang81412@126.com
I ran your file (I removed some strange characters and put in the returns) and it ran successfully.
It took a little while, but it ran and it says it was successful!
the comments it gives to the screen are okey, as they tell you that it failed with one analysis command but worked with the next.
please look over the output once you run it and let me know.
It took a little while, but it ran and it says it was successful!
the comments it gives to the screen are okey, as they tell you that it failed with one analysis command but worked with the next.
please look over the output once you run it and let me know.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Hi,
I think you ran the new file with dispBeamColumn elements...yes it works but I dont know if it's correct to use dispBeamColumn instead of nonlinearBeamColumn...I've been working on it for 2 weeks, so I prefer to use dispBeamColumn if it's right...please answer me as soon as possible...
thank you indeed
Hoda
I think you ran the new file with dispBeamColumn elements...yes it works but I dont know if it's correct to use dispBeamColumn instead of nonlinearBeamColumn...I've been working on it for 2 weeks, so I prefer to use dispBeamColumn if it's right...please answer me as soon as possible...
thank you indeed
Hoda
it is right, as it is the fundamental formulation.
however, you should discretize each structural element into many elements. and the disp-based element might have problems with softening systems.
you might want to compare the two element types, as they should give you similar results.
however, you should discretize each structural element into many elements. and the disp-based element might have problems with softening systems.
you might want to compare the two element types, as they should give you similar results.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
yes,I compared the results fo some records and they were similar,but I didnt discritize the element and I just replaced dispBeamColumn elements,with no other changes and it worked and the results were the same,but I dont know if it's right!!!!!!!!!!may I use this type of elements with no discritization?
i'd stay with the nonlinear beam-column element if it works with your case, as it certainly does not require discretization.
if you have problems with that element, then use the disp-based one.
if you have problems with that element, then use the disp-based one.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104