Convergence Issues

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
ddalgleish
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Texas A&M at Galveston

Convergence Issues

Post by ddalgleish »

I'm having problems with my model not converging. I'm using displacement beam columns and I've been reading around to see where convergence is an issue. I'm fairly new to finite modeling so I would like to know what are some basic ways to get a model to converge better. Can there be a convergence issue if I put too small of a tolerance on my beam columns or if I don't have a high max iterations on the beam columns? If this usually isn't the common issue then where is it?
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

the dispBeamColumn does not have the convergence issues associated with the forceBeamColumn .. the convergence problem you are having is a global one .. have you tried changing using an analysis procedure which attempts multiple algorithms and integration schemes if a step fails?
ddalgleish
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Texas A&M at Galveston

Post by ddalgleish »

No I haven't yet. I'm building my models through opensees navigator so I can see that my elements, ect. are all correct. I've noticed though, that navigator writes some analysis incorrectly like the newmark integrator so I have to go through and change what it writes.
Daniel
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

you need to rewrite the navigator analysis file to try different things if the analysis fails. the navigator authors have been made aware of this and there should be a means of specifying your own analysis option file.
ddalgleish
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Texas A&M at Galveston

Post by ddalgleish »

Yeah what happened is that I wrote a program that automatically made a section defined in patches based off of input of the dimensions from AISC. It rounded widths to set the number of fibers in a direction so if the shape was thinner than half an inch it would make 0 fibers in that direction. I fixed it though. I really appreciate the help thought! :P
Daniel
Post Reply