hi dear fmk
i have a question about modeling damper
you had proposed two kind of damper
[code]
element truss $eleTag $iNode $jNode $A $matTag
element zeroLength $eleTag $iNode $jNode -mat $matTag1 $matTag2 ... -dir $dir1 $dir2
[/code]
do performance these models in reducing response of structures to seismic loading are same?which one is better?
i tried both of them and their response was different.in first model(truss element), damper related to A and L(length of truss).
difference between two kind of damper
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: iran
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: iran
hi dear fmk
i tested truss element with A=1m2 and L=1m but the results werenot same with zeroLength element.
performance these dampers in reducing response of structures to seismic loading arenot same.and reduction in model with truss element is more.
when i define stiffness for spring in damper, do A and L in truss element also participate in stiffness?
set K 288499;
set C 9375.4;
set alpha 1;
#
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 $K;
uniaxialMaterial Viscous 2 $C $alpha;
#
element truss $eleTag $iNode $jNode $A $matTag
element truss 1 12 122 1 1;
element truss 2 12 122 1 2;
very thanks for your attention
i tested truss element with A=1m2 and L=1m but the results werenot same with zeroLength element.
performance these dampers in reducing response of structures to seismic loading arenot same.and reduction in model with truss element is more.
when i define stiffness for spring in damper, do A and L in truss element also participate in stiffness?
set K 288499;
set C 9375.4;
set alpha 1;
#
uniaxialMaterial Elastic 1 $K;
uniaxialMaterial Viscous 2 $C $alpha;
#
element truss $eleTag $iNode $jNode $A $matTag
element truss 1 12 122 1 1;
element truss 2 12 122 1 2;
very thanks for your attention