problem with changing transformation method

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
bkosbab
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:15 pm
Location: Georgia Institute of Technology

problem with changing transformation method

Post by bkosbab »

I build a model 3D model and defined linear transformations as outlined in the online manual, and with local y's defined upwards. The gravity load checked out ok. I then switched to corotational transformations, and the gravity load suddenly didn't check out anymore. It appears that the local y axes of some elements changed after just switching transformation methods. There were no discrepancies when only using nodal loads. Further investigation confirmed that, with corotational transformations used, the some of the local y's were changed to downward. Has this been seen before? Am I doing something wrong?
silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia »

frank was telling me that distributed loads don't work with the corotational transformation.....
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
bkosbab
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:15 pm
Location: Georgia Institute of Technology

Post by bkosbab »

I have run into a problem with axially distributed loads with corotational transformation before, but had never noticed the current issue before. Can you confirm that distributed loads in all directions are unreliable with corotational transformations? Thanks so much
silvia
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Degenkolb Engineers
Contact:

Post by silvia »

i've asked frank to reply.
Silvia Mazzoni, PhD
Structural Consultant
Degenkolb Engineers
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA. 94104
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

the 3d corotational transformation does IGNORES ele loads .. hopefully this wil be rectified in the next release.
bkosbab
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:15 pm
Location: Georgia Institute of Technology

Post by bkosbab »

Thanks for your reply; that is odd though. When I remove all loads except the eleload on one beam, using corotational transformation, I see a load. The load, which is verified as pointing directly downward by analyses with linear transformations, appears to act vertically upward when using corotational.

From here out, I won't try using any eleloads on elements with corotational transformations. Thanks
carnatin
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:37 am
Location: china

Post by carnatin »

Does the 3d corotational transformation consider ele loads in current release--version 2.2.0?
thanks
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

no.
Post Reply