WARNING during static analysis..

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Elina
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:34 am
Location: University of Patras

WARNING during static analysis..

Post by Elina »

Hello!
I run a static analysis for gravity loads for a 3-story 3-bayx 4-bayz building. I have 3 elements per beam and 2 elements per column. Because of that I use "dispBeamColumn" elements with fiber sections.
For the analysis I have the script below:

# Gravity-analysis parameters -- load-controlled static analysis
set Tol 1.0e-8;
constraints Lagrange ;
numberer RCM;
system BandGeneral ;
test NormDispIncr $Tol 10 ;
algorithm Newton;
set NstepGravity 10;
set DGravity [expr 1.0/$NstepGravity];
integrator LoadControl $DGravity 1 $DGravity $DGravity;
analysis Static;
analyze $NstepGravity;

and during analysis the message posted below appears:

goGravity
WARNING BandGenLinLapackSolver::solve() -LAPACK routine returned 1
WARNING NewtonRaphson::solveCurrentStep() -the LinearSysOfEqn failed in solve()
StaticAnalysis::analyze() - the Algorithm failed at iteration: 0 with domain at
load factor 0.1
OpenSees > analyze failed, returned: -3 error flag
Model Built
OpenSees >

Do you have any idea what is wrong???

Thank you very much!!
Elina
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:34 am
Location: University of Patras

Post by Elina »

If I try an eigen analysis the message is:

BandArpackSolver::Error in dgbtrf_
Warning FrequencyAlgo::solveCurrentStep() - the EigenSOE failed in solve().
EigenAnalysis::analyze() - algorithm failed
missing function argument at _@_
in expression "pow(_@_,0.5)"
OpenSees >
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

the failure of both solvers should indiacte to you that your model is incorrect, either you don't have enough constraints or your connectivity is not what you think it to be.
Elina
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:34 am
Location: University of Patras

Post by Elina »

About the constraints, all the base nodes are fixed and there is a rigid diaphragm for all the nodes at each floor (including the nodes at the ends of all the three parts each beam is seperated). Now, the nodes from the division of the columns are not constrained at all....
Do you think there might be a problem with this??
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

do you have master nodes for the rigid diaphragm .. if so if they don't have elements connected to them do you have the dof in the non-diagphragm directions constrained for these nodes?
Elina
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:34 am
Location: University of Patras

Post by Elina »

yes as it is suggested in example 8..
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

well then the problem lies elsewhere in your model .. the intermediate nodes do not need constraints.
Elina
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:34 am
Location: University of Patras

Post by Elina »

Thank you very much...
I'll check again nodes and member connectivity!!

One more question, can I source my tcl files (Model Build, Analysis) with BuildingTcl Release 1.9 and watch my results graphically?? Do you have any manual for this???

Thanks again!!!
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

no .. at the moment the model has to be built using building tcl extensions .. these extensions allow you to quickly build structural models.
Post Reply