Stiffness proportional damping does not seem to work

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
divamva
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:52 am
Location: National Technical University of Athens

Stiffness proportional damping does not seem to work

Post by divamva »

I have coded a simple SDOF system and subjected it to an earthquake
record and separately to a sine loading. All work just fine when using mass proportional damping. Unfortunately, if I try to use stiffness proportional damping (using any of the betaK, betaKinit, betaKcomm
or even all three in the command "rayleigh") the system behaves as totally undamped. I have discovered that the reason is my using a
zerolength element with "elastic material". It seems that this material
(and I am not sure about the other uniaxial materials as well) will not
generate damping (unless maybe the damping tangent "eta" is specifically provided). Now that I have realized that, my question is whether this
is a bug or a feature. I can easily see how someone with an MDOF system
with lots of such springs will not get from Rayleigh damping what he though he should get.

What do you guys think?
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Post by fmk »

truss and zeroLength elements determine their own damping .. all other elements use the default provided by the Element classial will work .. that is why providing eta for the material will work .. it is something that obviously needs to be clearly documented and i apologise that it is not
Guest

Post by Guest »

Thanks for clarifying that, I didn't know this applied to trusses as well. Can you also tell me what the "damping eta" is? I need to know how to
set it so that I can get what I want.

Thanks for the help
astrella
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: University at Buffalo

Stiffness proportional damping in nonlinearBeamColumn elemen

Post by astrella »

I have a 3D steel frame. All beams are beamWithHinges, all columns are nonlinearBeamColumns. I am trying to implement Rayleigh damping. When I use just the mass proportional term, good results. When I add stiffness proportional terms, I get messages to the effect of:

incompatible member forces and deformations in the element: __

The elements are always column elements. Is there something between the distributed plasticity and the stiffness proportional damping that I am missing? Thanks
gilgal77
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:36 am
Location: UCI

eta value in uniaxialMaterial Elastic

Post by gilgal77 »

I tried several times to find out what eta means.

My conclusion is k=(1+i* eta)K. That is the coefficient of histeric damping.

But I'm not sure.
Post Reply