Peak-Orinted
Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators
Peak-Orinted
Hi Silvia
Are deteriorating model for Peak-Oriented hysteretic systems implemented in Opensees? If not, what is equivalent model in Opensees?
Sincerely yours.
Are deteriorating model for Peak-Oriented hysteretic systems implemented in Opensees? If not, what is equivalent model in Opensees?
Sincerely yours.
Peak-orinted
Hi Silvia,
We mean the deteriorating model based on hysteretic energy dissipation that has been presented by Ibarra & Krawinkler in John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. 152. We want to use these basic cyclic deteriorating rules for peak-oriented hysteretic models. How can we do this?
Sincerely yours.
Alia.
We mean the deteriorating model based on hysteretic energy dissipation that has been presented by Ibarra & Krawinkler in John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. 152. We want to use these basic cyclic deteriorating rules for peak-oriented hysteretic models. How can we do this?
Sincerely yours.
Alia.
Clough
Hi,
I think what You nead is Clough material. Unfortunately it's not included in the documentation (manual), so you'll have to check the parameters.
As I recal, the function call looks sth. like this:
The meaning of some of the parameters can be seen from the following picture.
You can find out more about parameters in:
http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/p ... erlein.pdf
You can also check the class file for reference
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/a ... lough.html
I think what You nead is Clough material. Unfortunately it's not included in the documentation (manual), so you'll have to check the parameters.
As I recal, the function call looks sth. like this:
Code: Select all
uniaxialMaterial Clough $tag $Ke $My $My- $αc $resFac $αpc $θcap+ $θcap- $λc $λpc $c
You can find out more about parameters in:
http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/p ... erlein.pdf
You can also check the class file for reference
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/a ... lough.html
Last edited by zvidrih on Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Zlatko Vidrih
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Yes
Yes, one can use hysteretic material, but I think, what they are talking about in the report, that was mentioned earlier is strength and stiffness degradation, like the one shown in the pic.
Note, that black line is the monotonic envelope, which is used as input data.
Note, that black line is the monotonic envelope, which is used as input data.
Zlatko Vidrih
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: UCV
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: UCV
I can´t find the multi-cycle graphic for Hysteretic Material, there´s only a backbone curve, howerver there´s a well documented stiffness and strength degradation behavior for the "limit state material" in the sub-cap "Pinching4 uniaxial material model" page 90
Venezuelan Foundation For Seismological Research
Earthquake Engineering Department
Earthquake Engineering Department
Clough
Hi, sorry for late response,
I am quite sure, that "Clough" material, implemented in OpenSees, is actually the Ibarra model
Copy pasted from PEER report:
"Altoontash (2004) implemented this model into OpenSees (2006) as a material model that is accessed through the “Clough” material model command. Note that this name “Clough” is a misnomer, as the actual model is based on the work by Ibarra and Krawinkler (Ibarra 2003; Ibarra et al. 2005)."
PEER 2007/12 - An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Moment-Frame Building
Curt B. Haselton, Christine A. Goulet, Judith Mitrani-Reiser, James L. Beck, Gregory G. Deierlein, Keith A. Porter, Jonathan P. Stewart, Ertugrul Taciroglu.
See my post above for additional information on Clough material.
Hope it helps
I am quite sure, that "Clough" material, implemented in OpenSees, is actually the Ibarra model
Copy pasted from PEER report:
"Altoontash (2004) implemented this model into OpenSees (2006) as a material model that is accessed through the “Clough” material model command. Note that this name “Clough” is a misnomer, as the actual model is based on the work by Ibarra and Krawinkler (Ibarra 2003; Ibarra et al. 2005)."
PEER 2007/12 - An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Moment-Frame Building
Curt B. Haselton, Christine A. Goulet, Judith Mitrani-Reiser, James L. Beck, Gregory G. Deierlein, Keith A. Porter, Jonathan P. Stewart, Ertugrul Taciroglu.
See my post above for additional information on Clough material.
Hope it helps
Zlatko Vidrih
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Institute of Structural Engineering, earthquake Engineering and Construction IT
Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: UCV
I´m reading about this hysteretic model and found this:
- Maybe the "clough" name isn´t a misnomer, Ibarra et al. says: "This model keeps the basic hysteretic rules proposed by Clough and Johnston and later modified by Mahin and Bertero, but the backbone curve is modified to include strength capping and residual strength..." (Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Vol 34 N 12 2005).
- Haselton and Deierlein (2007 report 156 John Blume earthquake engineering center) write this warning: "We also set the unloading stiffness deterioration mode to have zero deterioration" and explains in the footnote " ...because there is currently an error in the Opensees implementation of the model: this error causes incorrect cyclic responses when the unloading stiffness deterioration mode is employed.
They´re talking about one must use always $c=0 , i think.
- Maybe the "clough" name isn´t a misnomer, Ibarra et al. says: "This model keeps the basic hysteretic rules proposed by Clough and Johnston and later modified by Mahin and Bertero, but the backbone curve is modified to include strength capping and residual strength..." (Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Vol 34 N 12 2005).
- Haselton and Deierlein (2007 report 156 John Blume earthquake engineering center) write this warning: "We also set the unloading stiffness deterioration mode to have zero deterioration" and explains in the footnote " ...because there is currently an error in the Opensees implementation of the model: this error causes incorrect cyclic responses when the unloading stiffness deterioration mode is employed.
They´re talking about one must use always $c=0 , i think.
Venezuelan Foundation For Seismological Research
Earthquake Engineering Department
Earthquake Engineering Department