Rigid diaphragm master node questions

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
ffilippi
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Location: California

Rigid diaphragm master node questions

Post by ffilippi »

I noticed that instead of creating an additional node to act as the master node for a rigid diaphragm, using one of the diaphragm constrained nodes as the master node does not influence the results (modal analysis).
Are there any dangers with this? Is there any reason why creating a "virtual" node is recommended?

For example to constrain nodes 5,6,7,8:
Instead of:
node 9 $X9 $Y9 $Z9; (the added virtual node)
fix 9 0 0 1 1 1 0 ;
rigidDiaphragm $perpDirn 9 5 6 7 8;

Just have:
rigidDiaphragm $perpDirn 5 6 7 8;

Thank you.
selimgunay
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:50 pm
Location: University of California, Berkeley

Re: Rigid diaphragm master node questions

Post by selimgunay »

A virtual node would be useful if you lump all the masses to a node at the center of mass. If you assign masses to individual nodes, you don't need the extra virtual node.
ffilippi
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Location: California

Re: Rigid diaphragm master node questions

Post by ffilippi »

selimgunay wrote:
> A virtual node would be useful if you lump all the masses to a node at the
> center of mass. If you assign masses to individual nodes, you don't need
> the extra virtual node.

Thank you very much for your reply.
Post Reply