rigidDiaphragm and fix

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Mohammadf
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:58 am

rigidDiaphragm and fix

Post by Mohammadf »

Hi dear all
when we want to define a rigid floor in a 3D frame we have to use rigidDiaphragm command and also we have to define a node as a center of mass. my question is is it necessary to define fix command afrer rigidDiaphragm or is not important? what is the rule?
best
xxlsunshine
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:45 pm
Location: Tongji University

Re: rigidDiaphragm and fix

Post by xxlsunshine »

I guess you have to fix your masternode of the rigiddiaphragm in those restrained dof. I don't why, but i read the example on the opensees home page. maybe the following website could help you.

http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... _W-Section
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: rigidDiaphragm and fix

Post by fmk »

if center of mass has no elements framing into it, then yes .. you need to constrain dof not in the constraint, e.g. vertical dof and 2 rotational dof out of plane if 3d model with 6 dof
Mohammadf
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:58 am

Re: rigidDiaphragm and fix

Post by Mohammadf »

Many thanks for your kindly reply
but my question is that we have to put fix command of center of mass node BEFORE rigidDiaphragm command or AFTER it?

1-
fix 9001 0 0 1 1 1 0
rigidDiaphragm 3 9001 101 102 103 104 105 106 107

2-
rigidDiaphragm 3 9001 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
fix 9001 0 0 1 1 1 0


which one is correct with transformation constraints?

Best
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: rigidDiaphragm and fix

Post by fmk »

does (should) not matter
Post Reply