The problem of invert flexibility on 3D column.

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
Jihoon
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:05 am
Location: Yonsei University

The problem of invert flexibility on 3D column.

Post by Jihoon »

Hi~ I posted about this topic Jul 27. I can't solve this problem yet.
So that's how I repost it. please help me~ :o :o

I'm modeling Meloland Road Overpass(continuous 2 span, 1 single poer) now.

Pier : nonlinearBeamColumn (fiber section)
Deck : elasticBeamColumn
Pier & Deck connection : Ligid Link
Boundary : foundation Pile spring (Jian Zhang and Nicos Makris .2002)

It can not work when I use slcaled ground motion(amplitude : <min -0.3972g>/<max 0.3623>).
On the other hand It works when i use other ground motion(lower value of amplitude).

It shows just ' ForceBeamColumn3d::update()--could not invert flexibility' message.

ForceBeamColumn3d::update()--could not invert flexibility
ForceBeamColumn3d::update()--could not invert flexibility
ForceBeamColumn3d::update()--could not invert flexibility
.
.
.
ForceBeamColumn3d::update()--could not invert flexibility

I think this problem appear on the pier(fiber section).

How can I solve this problem?

Thanks~~!!!
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: The problem of invert flexibility on 3D column.

Post by fmk »

to solve the problem you need to:
a) try something different in the analysis script, e.g. cut down step increment, change solution algorithm or integrator.
b) modify the material or sections supplied to the element by possibly throwing in some small elastic fibers
c) and of course you could try a dispBeamColumn element instead which may move the problem to the global level but which will give you a "theoretically" inferior answer if you indeed have a beam -column type element.
Post Reply