Bidirectional Earthquake groundmotion

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
hoseinrezaei
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: srbiau

Bidirectional Earthquake groundmotion

Post by hoseinrezaei »

Hi every body,

I want to apply bidirectional ground motion to a portal 2D frame.
are the masses assigned correct?
# ^Y
# |
# 3____________________4
# | |
# | |
# | |
# | |
# | |
# | |
# | |
# =1= =2= -------->X
#
#
# calculated parameters
set Weight [expr 2000.]; # beam weight
set PCol [expr $Weight/2]; # nodal dead-load weight per column
set Mass [expr $PCol/$g]; # nodal mass
set rotationalInertia [expr 1./12.*($Weight/$g)*pow($LBeam,2)];

# nodal masses:
mass 3 $Mass $Mass $rotationalInertia;
mass 4 $Mass $Mass $rotationalInertia;

Thanks in advance,
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: Bidirectional Earthquake groundmotion

Post by fmk »

you do have masses in all the degree of freedom at the two free nodes if that is the question.
hoseinrezaei
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: srbiau

Re: Bidirectional Earthquake groundmotion

Post by hoseinrezaei »

Thanks for your reply.
In bi-direction analysis the masses should be assigned to X and Y direction?
Another question is about rotational inertia. Is it need to be considered?
How does OpenSees consider the mass in transient analysis?
Thanks.
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: Bidirectional Earthquake groundmotion

Post by fmk »

most everybody ignores the rotational term. the mass terms goes into a mass matrix. How the mass matrix is used depends on the integration scheme. look at theory for Newmark or Cenral Difference to see what each does with the mass matix.
Post Reply