Search found 16 matches
- Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:55 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: Triangle elements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 18127
Re: Triangle elements
Yes. The analysis does not start at all. I found this could be the source but I do not know how to fix it.
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:25 am
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: Triangle elements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 18127
Triangle elements
Hi, I am getting an error while I run a model in Openseessp with the triangle elements-tri31 (the same model works fine with quad elements), and I am wondering is there anyone else who faced the same problem? Does Mumps support tri31 elements? This is the error: """" Fatal error ...
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:21 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Out of plane wave in two-dimensional problem
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2232
Out of plane wave in two-dimensional problem
Hi,
I am wondering if any of you guys knows a trick to apply an out-of-plane motion to a plane problem?
To clarify, imagine you have a quad element (x and y plane) and want to apply a force to it in the z-direction.
I am wondering if any of you guys knows a trick to apply an out-of-plane motion to a plane problem?
To clarify, imagine you have a quad element (x and y plane) and want to apply a force to it in the z-direction.
- Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:10 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7668
Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
No, I do not fix them. But, the problem is the way MultiSupport command is defined. Look at this "in OpenSees, the prescribed motion is applied using single-point constraints" ! this command forces the node to be zero after the end of excitation which is not desired. Thanks for your replie...
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:59 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7668
Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
That's the main problem. The command that you mentioned work as SP which forces the node to have zero displacement after end of the excitation which I do not want. I want to apply dashpots to the nodes to capture reflected waves.
- Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:55 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7668
Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
Thanks Soheil,
I had a look on this example and thanks for the steps. It is fine. My main question is that how to apply displacement instead of load in the last step?
I had a look on this example and thanks for the steps. It is fine. My main question is that how to apply displacement instead of load in the last step?
- Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:47 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7668
Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
Hi,
As far as I understood, when you apply displacement, ( SP or imposedgroundmotion) OpenSees extrapolate the displacement of the node after SP to be zero which causes the dashpots assigned to the note not to work. Is there anyway to resolve this problem?
As far as I understood, when you apply displacement, ( SP or imposedgroundmotion) OpenSees extrapolate the displacement of the node after SP to be zero which causes the dashpots assigned to the note not to work. Is there anyway to resolve this problem?
- Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:28 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Random excitation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6438
Re: Random excitation
Thanks for your response.
But how can I loop over time?
Can you write a simple schematic code in order to do that? Should the analysis section be in the loop?
Bests
But how can I loop over time?
Can you write a simple schematic code in order to do that? Should the analysis section be in the loop?
Bests
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:24 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Random excitation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6438
Re: Random excitation
Thanks.
I think this video is useful for adding something to the main code, I am looking for something simpler.
I think this video is useful for adding something to the main code, I am looking for something simpler.
- Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:04 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Random excitation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6438
Re: Random excitation
Imagine that I can write it in tcl but how OpenSees understands that? How should I code it so that Opensees understands?
There are certain ways to apply an excitation ( e.g. plain ... )
Thanks
There are certain ways to apply an excitation ( e.g. plain ... )
Thanks
- Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:25 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Random excitation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6438
Random excitation
Is there any way to apply f(t) (random input) at the base of the model?
I know we can apply timehistory using file but I am wondering if there is a way to apply a function which reads the deltaT from the input code and then apply the f(t) at the model.
Thanks
I know we can apply timehistory using file but I am wondering if there is a way to apply a function which reads the deltaT from the input code and then apply the f(t) at the model.
Thanks
- Sat Nov 12, 2016 2:19 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Using data as Initial condition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4086
Using data as Initial condition
Hi all, I am wondering if there a way to use results of an analysis as initial condition for the next analysis? For example, imagine that you wanna do static gravity analysis for an structure, then change some of the boundary conditions to do a dynamic analysis, how is it possible to do this? In reg...
- Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:23 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: A Problem in Running OpenSeesSP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9085
Re: A Problem in Running OpenSeesSP
It is sometimes tricky. But, if you follow the steps here, you should install it properly
http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/topic ... o-use-mpi/
http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/topic ... o-use-mpi/
- Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:11 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: Windows 10
- Replies: 11
- Views: 32201
Re: Windows 10
For others to know, it was because of the type of the flag I used for recorder.
- Tue Nov 01, 2016 6:02 pm
- Forum: Parallel Processing
- Topic: Windows 10
- Replies: 11
- Views: 32201
Re: Windows 10
It is solved and works perfectly. Just a quick question, have you ever faced a condition that, OpenSees sequential solves a problem perfectly but OpenSeesSP cannot solve it? By not solving, I mean it seems to be solving but it does not record anything. My model has two material if it helps. I tried ...