Search found 8 matches
- Sat May 13, 2017 6:37 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: PVD recorder and paraview
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2559
Re: PVD recorder and paraview
I've succesfully opened .pvd file in Paraview and visualized my model, and yes it can visualize line elements :D . The problem is that now I cannot see deformed shape, because "Warp by vector" option is grayed out in Paraview. I've recorded <disp> in a .pvd file as is said in http://web.en...
- Fri May 12, 2017 5:00 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: PVD recorder and paraview
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2559
PVD recorder and paraview
Greetings, I am experimenting with pvd recorder and Paraview software. I did succesfully made a pvd file out of my model (model is made of just of nodes and line elements), but when i open it in Paraview, nothing happens. Is it possible to visualize model with just line element (e.g. forceBeamColumn...
- Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:30 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: Analysis performance
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4085
Re: Analysis performance
fmk wrote: > the Makefile.def have just standard optimization features set .. the > windows binaries that are released (not the ones people build for > themselves) are optimized for intel processors and are also linked using > intels mkl library. > > the discrepency in time could mean that they defe...
- Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:13 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: Analysis performance
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4085
Analysis performance
Greetings, I want to run OpenSees on Linux machine and I compiled sequential version independently on CentOS on VirtualBox, Debian on VirtualBox and on CentOS on HPC, using appropriate Make.def.EC2 files. When comparing time needed for analysis to complete a job, performance is much worse than on Wi...
- Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:03 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: General question about constraints and solution alghoritms
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2073
General question about constraints and solution alghoritms
Greetings, Is there a general rule, in what situations to use different constraints handlers? And please do not tell me that solution is Trial and Error: use constraint handler that is good for your certain situation :D . I know only that I can not use Transformation method when retained node is not...
- Fri May 13, 2016 6:36 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SteelMPF problem?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3281
Re: SteelMPF problem?
You are welcome. For now I don't have any question.
Wish you luck.
Best Regards,
Nemanja
Wish you luck.
Best Regards,
Nemanja
- Wed May 04, 2016 11:12 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SteelMPF problem?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3281
SteelMPF problem?
Greetings, I’ve modeled simple pinned brace with imperfection and corotational transformation for buckling with two force based beam-column elements. At one end I’ve set controlled displacement with sp constraint. Used materials are, in one case SteelMPF, and in the other Steel02. Problem is that, w...
- Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:23 am
- Forum: Feature Requests/Future Directions
- Topic: Rigid offset for corotational transformation in 3D
- Replies: 0
- Views: 10984
Rigid offset for corotational transformation in 3D
Greetings,
I think it will be useful ti include rigid offset option for corotational transformation in 3D.
Nemanja
I think it will be useful ti include rigid offset option for corotational transformation in 3D.
Nemanja