Search found 5 matches
- Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:48 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: rotSpring2DModIKModel for 3D structures
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1830
rotSpring2DModIKModel for 3D structures
I want to use rotSpring2DModIKModel for a one-story, one-bay 3D structure in which there are two parallel moment frames in X direction and two simple pinned frames in Y direction. Can I do the following changes in rotSpring2DModIKModel.tcl for defining springs of columns in the X moment frames? 1- C...
- Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:31 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: SDOF modeling
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2904
SDOF modeling
How can i model a sdof system for specific ductility?
For example i want to model a sdof system with mu(ductility)=3, but i don't know what material or element i should use ?
For example i want to model a sdof system with mu(ductility)=3, but i don't know what material or element i should use ?
- Sat Nov 09, 2013 7:59 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Mass matrix or nodal mass
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4799
Re: Mass matrix or nodal mass
I tested this problem (Example: 2-Story Steel Moment Frame with Concentrated Plasticity). When I defined zero mass for the leaning column, opensees couldn't calculate the eigenvalue. But if these zero masses are removed, the periods will be calculated correctly. version with zero mass in leaning col...
- Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:38 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Mass matrix or nodal mass
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4799
Re: Mass matrix or nodal mass
Thanks from both of you. By a little chance I found the problem. it happens when I was trying to use leaning column in my model, if I give zero mass to nodes which are correspond to the leaning column the period is wrong (6.2) but when I delete this zero masses, it works correct and gives 0.7, I thi...
- Sat Oct 26, 2013 2:21 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Mass matrix or nodal mass
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4799
Mass matrix or nodal mass
I have a problem in calculating period by opensees.
why when I define mass at the end of nodes in the format of (node 32 45.75 9.45 -mass 13459.4 1e-9 1e-9 ), I've got the 1st period 0.7,
but surprisingly when I define it separately, (mass 32 13459.4 1e-9 1e-9 ), the 1st period will be 6.2 ?!
why when I define mass at the end of nodes in the format of (node 32 45.75 9.45 -mass 13459.4 1e-9 1e-9 ), I've got the 1st period 0.7,
but surprisingly when I define it separately, (mass 32 13459.4 1e-9 1e-9 ), the 1st period will be 6.2 ?!