Search found 112 matches

by skamalzare
Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:00 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Horizontal gravity in pseudo-static analysis
Replies: 0
Views: 1798

Horizontal gravity in pseudo-static analysis

Hi, Is there anyway to turn on/off the horizontal gravitational acceleration (i.e. $b1) in quadUP elements? element quadUP $eleTag $Node1 $Node2 $Node3 $Node4 $thick $matTag $bulk $fmass $PermX $PermY <$b1=0 $b2=0 $t=0> I am trying to perform a pseudo static analysis, and I want to first perform the...
by skamalzare
Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:41 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
Replies: 6
Views: 7669

Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition

Sanazzz, 1) Are your base nodes fixed? I expect them to be free to move. 2) My understanding is that the "Mulit-Support Excitation" command applies external displacements to your system. Accordingly, if your earthquake stops, there will be no external displacements added to the system. But...
by skamalzare
Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:00 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: opensees.exe has stopped
Replies: 2
Views: 3106

Re: opensees.exe has stopped

Thanks Frank,
We had same problem here too, and it took us lots of time to figure it out. The element/recorder removals are necessities in excavation analyses.

Regards,
Soheil
by skamalzare
Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:26 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
Replies: 6
Views: 7669

Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition

You can apply displacements to your model by using "Multi-Support Excitation" command. Just be careful, if you are applying the displacements to a fixed node, your displacements will be the average of zero and the input displacement (double check this as I am not sure).
by skamalzare
Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:08 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition
Replies: 6
Views: 7669

Re: Applying displacement and absorbing boundary condition

Sanazzz, To define absorbing boundary conditions, you need to follow these steps: 1. Remove all the constraints from your base (i.e. both x and y). 2. Tie all the base nodes to one of them in both x and y directions (i.e. equalDOF Node1 Node2 1 2 - Doesn't matter which one. Take one as the master an...
by skamalzare
Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:52 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Does WipeAnalysis remove Load Patterns?
Replies: 1
Views: 2351

Does WipeAnalysis remove Load Patterns?

Hi,

Would you please tell me if the WipeAnalysis command removes all the load patterns defined before it?

Thanks,
Soheil
by skamalzare
Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:34 am
Forum: Parallel Processing
Topic: Extremely Different Results in Cluster vs. PC
Replies: 2
Views: 5044

Re: Extremely Different Results in Cluster vs. PC

Dear Frank, Thanks for the comment. The problem was that VT-Cluster server had OpenSees/2.4.5 while I am using the latest version. I checked the displacements and noticed that I am assigning fix boundaries to the base two times during gravity analyses (once before the elastic state and once before t...
by skamalzare
Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:13 pm
Forum: Parallel Processing
Topic: Extremely Different Results in Cluster vs. PC
Replies: 2
Views: 5044

Extremely Different Results in Cluster vs. PC

Hi, I have a simple 3D model. It applies a ground motion to base of a reinforced soil profile and records the accelerations at its top surface. I run the code on my PC and results are just fine. Then I copy-paste the code to VT-Cluster server (linux machine) and run it there. The results are in orde...
by skamalzare
Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:19 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: FATAL: second_order_eqn: Complex roots
Replies: 4
Views: 5479

Re: FATAL: second_order_eqn: Complex roots

Hi, I faced this problem today, and spent one full day to solve it. Then I said let's add a few lines here for future people. Hopefully, it can save some time for them. The fatal error that we are seeing, is simply because OpenSees cannot solve a 2nd order (quadratic) equation somewhere in the model...
by skamalzare
Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:09 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: uniaxialmaterial hysteretic error
Replies: 5
Views: 5069

Re: uniaxialmaterial hysteretic error

For your recorders to save the outputs, you need to wipe out your results. For that, just add "wipe" to the end of your script.

SK
by skamalzare
Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:54 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: uniaxialmaterial hysteretic error
Replies: 5
Views: 5069

Re: uniaxialmaterial hysteretic error

Why don't you send us your code for defining the material?

SK
by skamalzare
Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:33 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Pressure Dependent Multi Yield02
Replies: 1
Views: 2317

Re: Pressure Dependent Multi Yield02

Hi Omer, If my understanding is right, the number after the "material" indicates the Gaussian point at which the stresses are calculated. I am not aware of any element with 17 Gauss points. Usually in 2D problems and with quadrilateral elements, we have four Gauss point. Therefore, you rec...
by skamalzare
Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:22 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Odd records
Replies: 2
Views: 2831

Re: Odd records

Hi Jhno, It really depends on the material you are using. For example if you are using ND-Material: PDMY for 2D problems you will record: Sigma_XX, Sigma_YY, Sigma_ZZ, Sigma_XY and Eta_r. Where Eta_r is the ratio between the shear (deviatoric) stress and peak shear strength at the current confinemen...
by skamalzare
Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:11 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: element removing from analysis
Replies: 2
Views: 3102

Re: element removing from analysis

Hi, When you remove an element/node, you need to remove it and its connections (if used, e.g. interface elements) from recorder too. This should happen before performing any subsequent analyses. Note that the tags for recorders start from 0, then 1, 2, 3, ... For an example, please check: http://ope...
by skamalzare
Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:12 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: release the end moment of element
Replies: 4
Views: 4915

Re: release the end moment of element

Hi - I am not that much familiar with rigidDiaphragm setting, but can't you remove the rotational constraints on your interested node? (i.e. using the command: remove sp $nodeTag $dof)

Regards,
Soheil