Hello
Does anyone have a test/validation case for ShellMITC4 element, e.g. pinching cylinder problem? Since I did not analytical results with that test.
Cheers
G
Search found 9 matches
- Fri Aug 11, 2023 6:51 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Validation of MITC4 element
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3269
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:54 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: operator && for Vector
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11725
Re: operator && for Vector
OK, i found it. It's in T2Vector.h
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:54 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: operator && for Vector
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11725
operator && for Vector
I saw somewhere in the code this computation is used: double normTS = pow( TStressDev && TStressDev, 0.5); However, when I look into the definition of Vector in matrix/Vector.h, I did not see the operator && defined. Could anyone help to explain the source of this operation? Best Giang
- Tue May 02, 2017 1:28 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3542
Re: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
You're right. I made a mistake. For this example I can get convergence only with tol > 1e-08 (test RelativeNormUnbalance 1.0e-8 10 1 2). For the other example, I can get convergence with lower tolerance, but it's with higher thickness. This is still skeptical that that code segment destroyed the ele...
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:01 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3542
Re: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
Hi I would like to report that starting from r5141, this commit below destroyed the convergence of ShellMITC4 element: void ShellMITC4::formResidAndTangent( int tang_flag ) { ... //start Yuli Huang (yulihuang@gmail.com) & Xinzheng Lu (luxz@tsinghua.edu.cn) updateBasis( ); // I'm not quite sure w...
- Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:57 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3542
Re: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
You're correct, the ShellDKGQ also works robustly for other tests as well. Nevertheless, in the literature, MITC4 is claimed to be more superior in terms of accuracy. I can help get debug it, if you point me to some material containing explicit algorithm, equations, ...
Best regards
Best regards
- Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:16 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: convergence of ShellMITC4 element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3542
convergence of ShellMITC4 element
Hello I ran a patch test to check the accuracy of the ShellMITC4 element. The reference of the patch test is according to the example 1 of the paper: Dvorkin & Bathe, A continuum mechanics based four node shell element for general nonlinear analysis. The paper shows that if the element works, th...
- Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:39 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: soil nDMaterial
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1385
Re: soil nDMaterial
I have the same questions as above. I want to use it for soil to replace Drucker-Prager. Does anyone in this forum have experience with this kind of material ?
- Sun Jul 28, 2013 2:13 pm
- Forum: Documentation
- Topic: bug in DruckerPragerPlaneStrain
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1852
bug in DruckerPragerPlaneStrain
Hi OpenSees developers, I think there is a bug in function DruckerPragerPlaneStrain::getInitialTangent The current code is: const Matrix& DruckerPragerPlaneStrain::getInitialTangent() { tangent(0,0) = mCep(0,0); tangent(0,1) = mCep(0,1); tangent(0,2) = mCep(0,3); tangent(1,0) = mCep(1,0); tangen...