Search found 24 matches
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:10 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Zero curvature recorded byeleResponse in version 2.4.6
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2339
Re: Zero curvature recorded byeleResponse in version 2.4.6
Thank you for your prompt response. I double checked and it seems that the number of digits stored for the output in version 2.4.6 is less than version 2.4.4 If I want the outputs in a text file the "Recorder" command works just fine. However, "eleResponse" not, since the values ...
- Tue Nov 10, 2015 8:50 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Zero curvature recorded byeleResponse in version 2.4.6
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2339
Zero curvature recorded byeleResponse in version 2.4.6
Hi, I have a 3D bridge model with concrete columns models with fiber section. I use eleResponse command to save the curvature of the elements in tcl lists for further analysis using the following format: eleResponse $element_number section $integration_point deformation I used this command in the la...
- Sun Sep 13, 2015 8:29 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Saving the results in a tcl list
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3008
Re: Saving the results in a tcl list
I found this page which I think should be the answer of my question:
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... t_Commands
Thanks though.
http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... t_Commands
Thanks though.
- Sun Sep 13, 2015 8:16 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Saving the results in a tcl list
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3008
Re: Saving the results in a tcl list
Dear fmk, Thank you for your response. Is there an equivalent command for every type of node and element recorder? I am aware of the following commands for node reactions and element forces: nodeReaction eleForce How about other types of outputs? For example element deformation outputs. Or outputs f...
- Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:28 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Saving the results in a tcl list
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3008
Saving the results in a tcl list
Hi, Is it possible to save the results of a time history analysis in a tcl list. For example element forces of a particular element of the model in all time steps of the analysis. I need to get a lot of outputs from my model and I think this amount of IO makes the process slower. Also the size of th...
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 3:10 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with damping force
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3527
Re: Problem with damping force
Dear fmk, Its absolutely fine. Hope you had a nice holiday. I checked the velocities at different nodes. I think they look reasonable. For example, I looked at the base node which is fixed in all DOFs. It shows zero velocity (as it should be), but there are those spikes in the damping force. The vel...
- Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:39 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with damping force
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3527
Re: Problem with damping force
Dear fmk,
I tried Plain constraint and still I have the same problem!
I tried Plain constraint and still I have the same problem!
- Wed Jun 03, 2015 4:12 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with damping force
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3527
Problem with damping force
Hi, I have a problem with the damping force I get from my analysis. I have a simple cantilever column which is a concrete column modeled with fiber section. The mass is applied to the top node. My problem is when I check the damping forces at different nodes, other than the base node (fixed node at ...
- Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:59 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4436
Re: Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
Its just meaningless random numbers. If you run the model you will see what I mean.
- Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:16 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4436
Re: Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
Yes, you are right. But actually I need to make this work for another model. I want to know why this simple model does not work.
- Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:17 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Elastic beam column with distributed mass
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3076
Re: Elastic beam column with distributed mass
This is how the element is described in the website:
element elasticBeamColumn $eleTag $iNode $jNode $A $E $Iz $transfTag <-mass $massDens>
so, maybe the website needs to be updates!
element elasticBeamColumn $eleTag $iNode $jNode $A $E $Iz $transfTag <-mass $massDens>
so, maybe the website needs to be updates!
- Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:02 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Elastic beam column with distributed mass
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3076
Elastic beam column with distributed mass
Has anyone used distributed mass option of the "elasticBeamColumn" element?
I tried to use it and it returns the following error:
invalid d - elasticBeamColumn 2100 iNode jNode A E I alpha d
expected floating-point number but got "-mass"
I tried to use it and it returns the following error:
invalid d - elasticBeamColumn 2100 iNode jNode A E I alpha d
expected floating-point number but got "-mass"
- Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:34 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4436
Using rigid link elements with zero length elements!
I have a very simple model as follows. The models is two rigid link beam elements which are connected to each other with a zero length element. I want to pull one end of one of the rigid elements and evaluate the deformation and force of the rigid link element. However it returns wrong answer. Would...
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:53 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6934
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
Thanks a lot.
- Fri May 31, 2013 7:08 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6934
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
Dear fmk, I think you forgot to put the solver type right at the end of the code. I mean you have: puts "#dirn mass acting: $massDirn solverType: $solverType eigenvalue: [eigen 1]" So, the solver is always the default. I think it should be as follows if you want to try it with both solvers...