Search found 214 matches
- Sun Dec 30, 2018 9:39 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: error 3X3 BRB steel frames
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4990
Re: error 3X3 BRB steel frames
WARNING: CTestEnergyIncr::test() - failed to converge after: 50 iterations This mean that your model failed to meet the test criteria. The rest of the message says the same, only you used an "adaptative" solution so once once criteria fails, it try another one and so forth. This is your te...
- Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:10 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Damping in New Material
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7730
Re: Damping in New Material
Assuming that you observe the reduction during the free oscillating phase of the loading, since you used the equivalent of the viscous damper but applied to acceleration, is it not normal that you observe this reduction in movement?
- Wed Oct 03, 2018 3:11 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Damping in New Material
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7730
Re: Damping in New Material
No idea. One simple way thought to check if it comes from your material is to use another already built in material, like a elastic one. If you get no damping using this alternative material, you know it comes from your code. If you do get damping using this other material, you know it does not nece...
- Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:09 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Damping in New Material
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7730
Re: Damping in New Material
When you select the newmark method, you specify gamma and beta. If you use gamma>0.5, you induce numerical damping equivalent to gamma-0.5.
Beta should then be selected as 1/4*(gamma+1/2).
If you used gamma = 0.5 and Beta as 1/4, I don't think you did induce numerical damping.
Beta should then be selected as 1/4*(gamma+1/2).
If you used gamma = 0.5 and Beta as 1/4, I don't think you did induce numerical damping.
- Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:26 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Damping in New Material
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7730
Re: Damping in New Material
Did you impose numerical damping?
- Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:01 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7147
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
Check your model against proposed example and you will eventually find the problem. I would suggest you use simpler element for a start (don't start with a complex fluid-coupled model as it introduce more difficulty.. you can add it later when you have a solid model).
GL
GL
- Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:16 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7147
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
Shall I just model it as a column to see the natural frequencies? -- I would tend to say it depend on why you want to model this soil deposit. You say you want to " do the eigen value analysis ". If this is your only objectif, use the relation 4H/(Vs*(2n-1)) to obtain the n-th periods valu...
- Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:08 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7147
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
May I ask what type of soil you are modelling? It's very hard to say anything without carefully looking the code. In any cases, did you check the OS example of a soil column analysis? http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Site_Response_Analysis_of_a_Layered_Soil_Column_(Total_Stress_Analysis) ...
- Wed Sep 26, 2018 5:23 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Eigen Value Analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7147
Re: Eigen Value Analysis
Are you doing your analysis in the elastic or inelastic phase of the PDMY material?
Also make sure you have correct effective stress and correct small strain G and K.
If you still get discrepancy, perhaps you should try with a 1D column using elastic isotropic material first to get the 4H/Vs value.
Also make sure you have correct effective stress and correct small strain G and K.
If you still get discrepancy, perhaps you should try with a 1D column using elastic isotropic material first to get the 4H/Vs value.
- Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:23 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Convergence achieved with reduced dt!
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2500
Re: Convergence achieved with reduced dt!
Consider à Variable Transient analysis? http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index ... is_Command
- Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:03 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem in "recorder" file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3687
Re: Problem in "recorder" file
Did you empty the memory after the analysis was complete (wipe command or close the OS programs)?
- Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:23 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Analysis problem
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7118
Re: Analysis problem
Thk for the input; I did not know about this !
- Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:16 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Analysis problem
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7118
Re: Analysis problem
IT happens when an impossible command is issued. Use a print screen (quick) when the windows fade off. If you time it right, you will see a error command displayed in the OS windows. Might take several attemps to time it right (put a "gets stdin" before the closing of the windows in your s...
- Wed Aug 08, 2018 5:02 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Mẫu biển quảng cáo spa thẩm mỹ viện đẹp
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2329
Re: can't open txt file
set f11 [open input.txt r]
set f1 [read $f11]
Now the data are stored in var f1
set f1 [read $f11]
Now the data are stored in var f1
- Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:03 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: wipe command and Clearing variables
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2835
Re: wipe command and Clearing variables
I am afraid not. See the discussion here about the same question and solution. In your case, keeping track of your variable in a list then using a loop with unset would appears the best approach.
http://computer-programming-forum.com/5 ... 071742.htm
GL
http://computer-programming-forum.com/5 ... 071742.htm
GL