Search found 23 matches
- Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:33 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: About the isotropic hardening rules of Steel01/02
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7386
Re: About the isotropic hardening rules of Steel01/02
ishinabe wrote: > I have checked the source code "Steel01.cpp". > Then I think the source code seems to implement Ludwik's hardening equation > (not the equation proposed by Dr. Filippou et al. in EERC83-19). > But the strain hardening exponent "0.8" is incomprehensible. > I thin...
- Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:55 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: base shear
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4784
Re: base shear
Oh I have just found the reason. I made a mistake when calculate the earthquake input energy. The first acceleration in the input ground motion file corresponds to time "0.0 sec". I took it as "0.02 sec". That caused all the differences. Sorry for the confusing problems in the la...
- Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:39 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: base shear
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4784
Re: base shear
fmk wrote: > the reaction recorders will record the nodal force unbalance at a node > (node forces - element forces), the nodal reaction! > > in a transient analysis the other recorders will not be 0 as the inertia > forces and damping forces are not included. in a static analysis recorders > record...
- Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:47 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: Building v.2.4.4
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17638
Re: Building v.2.4.4
blaiman wrote: > It's very simple. Look under the TclModelBuilderUniaxialMaterialCommand.cpp > file under the material/uniaxial folder and then comment out the following > lines: > extern void *OPS_DoddRestr(void); > } else if ((strcmp(argv[1],"DoddRestr") == 0)) { > > void *theMat = OPS_D...
- Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:53 am
- Forum: Framework
- Topic: Building v.2.4.4
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17638
Re: Building v.2.4.4
blaiman wrote:
> I fixed the problem. Simply just commented out the "DoddRestr"
> class calls and it builds perfectly fine now.
Hi blaiman, I has encountered exactly the same error with yours. Could you please explain how you fixed the problem in detail? Thank you very much~
> I fixed the problem. Simply just commented out the "DoddRestr"
> class calls and it builds perfectly fine now.
Hi blaiman, I has encountered exactly the same error with yours. Could you please explain how you fixed the problem in detail? Thank you very much~
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:14 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: What does the tolerance at element level mean?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2686
Re: What does the tolerance at element level mean?
OK I understand~Thank you very much for your help!
- Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:48 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: What does the tolerance at element level mean?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2686
What does the tolerance at element level mean?
For some kinds of elements such as "Force-Based Beam-Column Element" and "Beam With Hinges Element", there is such item "<-iter $maxIters $tol>" in the element commands. And the explanations in wiki are as following (for beam with hinges element): $maxIters maximum numb...
- Sun Dec 15, 2013 6:00 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Running OpenSees files from Notepad++
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11938
Re: Running OpenSees files from Notepad++
I have the same question with Panos. Does anyone know any solutions?
- Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:54 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7881
Re: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
Sorry it didn't work because I used the old version. After I updated it works well.
- Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:52 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: indicate formation of plastic hinges in FBE, fiber section
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4824
indicate formation of plastic hinges in FBE, fiber section
Dear all, Now I am confused with some basic questions.. I want to track the locations of plastic hinges formed in a 3D steel frame model during time-history analysis. I use fiber section with forceBeamColumn elements. The sections are H-shaped and box shaped thin-walled sections. But I wonder how de...
- Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:30 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7881
Re: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
wipe all; # Start of model generation # ========================= # Create ModelBuilder # ------------------- model BasicBuilder -ndm 3 -ndf 6 setMaxOpenFiles 610 # Define geometry # --------------- source NodeCoord.tcl puts "nodecoord" # Define Single Point Constraints # -----------------...
- Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:10 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7881
Re: Limit on Maximum Number of Recorders
When I use "setMaxOpenFiles" command, OpenSEES.tcl returned "invalid command name". What's the problem? My computer OS is Windows 64.
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:53 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5511
Re: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
There are two reasons:
1. I don't think there is force which can cause such deformation.
2. In the full rocking frame model the "Z" shape deformation became very large and caused the analysis fail.
1. I don't think there is force which can cause such deformation.
2. In the full rocking frame model the "Z" shape deformation became very large and caused the analysis fail.
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:58 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5511
Re: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
I also checked the element force of the three elements for modeling BRB. The bending moments are quite small.
- Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:13 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5511
Re: unexpected deformation of BRB in the rocking frame
Some possible reasons I have checked: 1. Display mistake I checked the data. It also showed same deformation. 2. Geometric transformation Both "Corotational" and "Linear" gave the same "Z" shape deformation 3. Element type no influence 4. Constraint type no influence 5....