The OpenSees Community

I want to download old versions.

I confront with the same problem, and there are some bugs in Version 1.7.5.
Hope the new OpenSees Version 1.7.6 will be released as soon as possible.

hi, everyone

help me, it's a big trouble for me.

Hi koduru, FORM, SORM and SAMPLING are applied, and the same results obtained by FORM, SORM, but SAMPLING received different result. And I decrease the standard deviation of load p, and the coefficient of variance is 0.17%, but similar results are gained as follows: # FORM ##########################...

koduru,
I'll try the methods your advised. Thanks a lot.
I am a new user, and your suggestions is valuable to me, thanks again.[/img]

dcizmar, I'm so appreciated for your patience and help.

I run it on 1.7.5. version, but I can get the reliability index is 1.3418 in sampling analysis.

dcizmar, thanks for your help, your reply is very useful to me. but l don't know how to get this data 0.1963 from the results of FORM? And I input the following file to OpenSees, but get different reliability index, I don't know why. Example1a.out ####################################################...

koduru, thanks for your help. Here is the Example1f.out ####################################################################### # SAMPLING ANALYSIS RESULTS, LIMIT-STATE FUNCTION NUMBER 1 # # # # Reliability index beta: ............................ 1.1147 # # Estimated probability of failure pf_sim: ...

To koduru,
I'm so appreciated for your reply, thanks a lot.

Hi everybody,
In the following example , where should the command "rvRedection" be positioned?
thanks a lot.

Hi everyone, In this reliability analysis, FORMAnalysis and SamplingAnalysis are applied, but the results are different evidently, the reliability index of the former is 2.70345, but the latter is 1.1147. The results should be consistent, who can tell me why? thank you model basic -ndm 2 -ndf 2 reli...

rjaeger, thanks for your advice, but I don't know how to contact with Frank, Do you have his/her email? thank you very much.

thanks for your advice.

ok, thanks, silvia I'll contact author of that example. but for Q1, I think it's a bug. Q1: I want define axial force of truss as performance function, as follows performanceFunction 1 "671000+{rec_element_1_localForce_1}" limit-state function number: 1 child killed: segmentation violation

silvia:

I run the example3b.tcl in opensees, version 1.7.4 and 1.7.5, but both didn't work.

you said, "I don't think that material is in this version."

which version is feasible for "uniaxialMaterial SmoothSteel01"?

thanks for you help.