Search found 17 matches

by andrewfirst
Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:46 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Period changed after gravity load analysis
Replies: 4
Views: 4201

Thank you Dr. Silvia.
by andrewfirst
Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:58 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Period changed after gravity load analysis
Replies: 4
Views: 4201

I suspect this may be a bug in OpenSees. Very disappointed.
by andrewfirst
Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:39 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Period changed after gravity load analysis
Replies: 4
Views: 4201

In the Example5, the structural period decreases after gravity analysis, which means the stiffness increases. This is too weird for me. Anyone help me?
by andrewfirst
Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:43 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Period Difference between SAP and OPENSEES
Replies: 43
Views: 26931

Hi, basir
I've encountered similar problems now.
Have you resolved them?
by andrewfirst
Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:41 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Period changed after gravity load analysis
Replies: 4
Views: 4201

Period changed after gravity load analysis

Dear all
I'm analyzing a RC frame structure, and wondering why the structural period changed after gravity load analysis. If it should change as a result of change of material stiffness, then it should increase or decrease? Thank you.
by andrewfirst
Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:26 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

Dear Silvia: I've changed all the element into nonlinearbeamcolumn and defined uniform girder load as many concentrated load. The TH analysis can obtain reasonable results but can only run for several seconds. Then it display many messages about "can not get compatible forces and deformations f...
by andrewfirst
Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:30 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

All the sections has been run for moment curveture analysis. No problem.
by andrewfirst
Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:16 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

The grounmotion file is processed already with PGA=1 and no units. So in the Pattern UniformExicition.. I set the 'factor' to 0.4g. I've tried using the 'nonlinearbeamcolumn' and removed the uniform load on girders. Then the computation failed at about 0.3s because of 'Can't obtain equilibrium withi...
by andrewfirst
Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:17 am
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

This is the full code. Anyone help me? # Reinforced concrete multi-bay, two-story frame # Distributed vertical load on girder # Displacement-based beam-column elements # Gravity load analysis followed by transient analysis # Units: kg,m,sec ->> N,Pa wipe #-------------------------- # define GEOMETRY...
by andrewfirst
Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:47 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

No. It seems that the scaling of ground motion does not influence the lateral displacement! Just in about 0.2s the lateral displacement runs to very high values (e.g. several times of storey height)
by andrewfirst
Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:40 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

Yes, I've checked it for many times and can't found what's wrong. Even if I scaled the input acceleration to very low, the displacement result is still too large. How weird!
by andrewfirst
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:31 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis
Replies: 15
Views: 10816

Very large displacement result of timehistory analysis

I'm doing nonlinear transient analysis of a simple one story-three bay RC frame. The lateral displacement result runs quickly to almost 100% storey height during first steps, which is very weird. I've checked the code and done the moment-curture analysis of column. The eigenvalue analysis is correct...
by andrewfirst
Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:11 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Moment curvature
Replies: 10
Views: 8883

The former units is : Ton, mm, sec, N, .... The result does not converge.
Then the unit is changed into SI: kg, m, sec, N... The result converge.
I think both two unit system is right. The problem may lie in the program itsself.
by andrewfirst
Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:45 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Moment curvature
Replies: 10
Views: 8883

I just encountered the same problem.
I modified the tcl file by using the unit system of SI: kg,m,sec,N...
The nonconvergence problem is solved.
But what is the reason? Numerical precision?
by andrewfirst
Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:46 pm
Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
Topic: Negative eigenvalues
Replies: 6
Views: 7010

I just attached the code to this post. Anyone help me?