Search found 23 matches
- Mon Oct 24, 2016 2:48 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Recorder for fiber elements
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2064
Recorder for fiber elements
Hi all... can anyone please let me know how to record output from fibers? Let's say, I want to read stresses and strains from selected fibers in the problem described in the MomentCurvature.tcl script (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Moment_Curvature_Example). When I add the following li...
- Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:11 pm
- Forum: Documentation
- Topic: Modeling of shearwall using ShellMITC4 element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11766
Re: Modeling of shearwall using ShellMITC4 element
Did somebody worked how to interpolate shell stresses from gauss points to nodal points? I've tried a simple 2D interpolation using matlab, but when comparing the stresses of two elements with common nodes, it can be seen that the error is very high using this interpolation. I guess I'll have to use...
- Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:12 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Exporting Stiffness Matrix
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1763
Exporting Stiffness Matrix
Hi..
Is there a way to export the stiffness matrix of a model from opensees to a .txt file?
Thanks!
Is there a way to export the stiffness matrix of a model from opensees to a .txt file?
Thanks!
- Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:05 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Bridge Deck Modeling issues
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6334
Re: Bridge Deck Modeling issues
Thanks for the reply Vesna. If you mean use "Node recorder -reaction", that doesn't work, because I get the results shown above: 0 0 0.0011 -1.2991 0.0083 0 0 0 0.0011 1.2991 0.0083 0 0 0 0.0011 -1.2991 -0.0083 0 0 0 0.0011 1.2991 -0.0083 0 for the supported nodes. So, how can I get "...
- Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:48 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Condensed Degrees of Freedom
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1930
Condensed Degrees of Freedom
Hello.. I'm trying to run a model with a large number of degrees of freedom (I have 4190 nodes). Is there a way to condense desired degrees of freedom in such a way that I can run a dynamic analysis in a short time? Currently I'm trying to run a dynamic loading situation, where a load takes 3 second...
- Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Bridge Deck Modeling issues
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6334
Re: Bridge Deck Modeling issues
When I change the type of constrain to equalDOF 2 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 22 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 21 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 4 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 24 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 23 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 equalDOF 3 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 The output of the nodes 1-8 is 0 0 0.0011 -1.2991 0.0...
- Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:08 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Bridge Deck Modeling issues
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6334
Bridge Deck Modeling issues
Hello. The code provided below intends to simulate a loaded deck over a bridge. The deck is modeled using shell elements, and the girders are modeled using beam elements. The deck is connected to the girders through rigid links. The load over the deck is 40 kip, and the vertical reactions at the sup...
- Mon Jul 09, 2012 12:01 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Preffered analysis options
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3068
Re: Preffered analysis options
vesna wrote: > To me it looks like the analysis is hanging somewhere (it got stuck). > > For large models use Sparse solvers (e.g. UmfPack). Your tolerance may be > too low. I would not go lower than 1e-8. > > make use of "puts" command to check the progress of your > analysis. Do your anl...
- Sun Jul 08, 2012 11:54 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Preffered analysis options
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3068
- Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:31 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Preffered analysis options
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3068
Preffered analysis options
Hi everyone, I have a model with +4100 nodes, containing elastic beam elements and shell MITC4 elements. I'm trying to make a time history analysis but it's taking very long, which seems weird to me. I'm using the following analysis options: integrator Newmark 0.5 0.25; test EnergyIncr 1.0e-12 10 0 ...
- Thu May 05, 2011 1:14 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Order of eigenvectors
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2389
Re: Order of eigenvectors
Here's is a test: Cantilever beam, section 0.2x0.3 m2, L=10m, E=24GPa, G=10GPa, Ro=2400kg/m3; Izz=4.5e-4, Iyy=2e-4, J=4.695e-4. The stiffness and mass matrices are: K = [ E*A/L, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] [ 0, 12*E*Iy/L^3, 0, 0, 0, -6*E*Iy/L^2] [ 0, 0, 12*E*Iz/L^3, 0, 6*E*Iz/L^2, 0] [ 0, 0, 0, G*J/L, 0, 0] [ 0,...
- Wed May 04, 2011 1:13 pm
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Order of eigenvectors
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2389
Order of eigenvectors
Hi there
I'm trying to perform model updating, for which I need eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The first ones are output in ascending order, but the eigenvectors have not the same output order as the eigenvalues. Is there a way to associate the output eigenvectors to the output eigenvalues? Thanks!
I'm trying to perform model updating, for which I need eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The first ones are output in ascending order, but the eigenvectors have not the same output order as the eigenvalues. Is there a way to associate the output eigenvectors to the output eigenvalues? Thanks!
- Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:26 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4585
Re: Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
The problem seems to be in the definition of the geometric transformation. Thanks again!
- Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:39 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4585
Re: Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
vesna wrote: > Rigid links are only MP_constraint objects. They are not elements. In your > model you do not have enough elements. Instead of having element that goes > from 3 to 4 you need two elements: one that goes from 3 to 5 and another > from 5 to 4. You also need an element to connect two col...
- Thu Apr 07, 2011 5:08 am
- Forum: OpenSees.exe Users
- Topic: Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4585
Problem with Rigid Link formulation?
Hi there. I'm trying to create a model which includes rigid links, but I'm constantly having the error: ProfileSPDLinDirectSolver::solve() - aii < 0 (i, aii): (2, 0) WARNING NewtonRaphson::solveCurrentStep() -the LinearSysOfEqn failed in solve() StaticAnalysis::analyze() - the Algorithm failed at it...